Category Archives: Food Sovereignty
According to a recent post on GMWatch.org, a new report shows that safety testing for GMOs with stacked traits isn’t as thorough as it should be. The study showed that stacking traits in GMO crops could result in unexpected combination effects that slack regulations aren’t catching.
These combination effects could impact herbicide tolerance, create abnormal protein levels and metabolic pathways. The study also found that “stacking herbicide and insecticide transgenes induces synergistic and antagonistic effects in the proteome of such plants.”
Last August, the New Yorker published an abusive attack on Dr. Vandana Shiva’s anti-GMO activism. One must presume that this widely circulated article “Seeds of Doubt” by Michael Specter was produced on behalf of the vituperative biotech industry. This may be old news to those of you that followed this story and the reaction by Vandana Shiva and those that share her values and vision.
Dr. Shiva penned a response that was not so widely circulated. Today, Independent Science News has re-published that response. We are pleased to share it with you. Help to get this message out there!
Dr. Vandana Shiva. Independent Science News. 15 December 2014
(A response to the article ‘Seeds of Doubt’ by Michael Specter in The New Yorker)
I am glad that the future of food is being discussed, and thought about, on farms, in homes, on TV, online and in magazines, especially of The New Yorker’s caliber. The New Yorker has held its content and readership in high regard for so long. The challenge of feeding a growing population with the added obstacle of climate change is an important issue. Specter’s piece, however, is poor journalism. I wonder why a journalist who has been Bureau Chief in Moscow for The New York Times and Bureau Chief in New York for the Washington Post, and clearly is an experienced reporter, would submit such a misleading piece. Or why The New Yorker would allow it to be published as honest reporting, with so many fraudulent assertions and deliberate attempts to skew reality.
The Alliance for Food Sovereignty in Africa (AFSA) released an open letter to the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Dr. Wendy White from Iowa State University (ISU) and the Human Institutional Review Board of Iowa State strongly opposing the GM banana human feeding trials taking place at ISU.
The bananas have been genetically modified to contain more beta-carotene, intended to combat the health impacts of Vitamin A deficiencies that occur frequently in Uganda. More than 120 organizations, along with farmers, advocates and indigenous communities have signed the open letter, claiming the GM banana poses not only a health and ecological risk, but is also a demeaning insult to the rich Ugandan food and cultural heritage.
When the people of Hernani, Spain, began a residential compost system, they weren’t looking to become heroes of the movement for climate justice. Like thousands of other towns around the world, they were simply looking for an alternative to incineration and the pollution it brings.
Under the leadership of their dynamic mayor, resident of the Honduran municipality of Victoria have used food security and natural farming techniques to reduce malnutrition, improve housing, reject the slash-and-burn technique for clearing fields and purify drinking water. By growing their own food, they have begun to see a significant overall improvement in the quality of life that impresses other Honduras communities, as well as international bodies.
by Anne Petermann, Executive Director, Global Justice Ecology Project
In a society rising up against the corporate capture of our food supply in the form of GMOs, a new untested and not-yet-approved GMO food is being promoted: the GMO chestnut.
A recent op-ed in the Washington Post, however, makes the silly assertion that this emerging new GMO food will be the answer to hunger and a step toward reconnecting with our food supply:
Repopulating our woods — and even our yards, our commons and our courthouse lawns — with [GE] American chestnuts would put a versatile, nutritious, easily harvested food source within reach of just about everyone. For those living on the margins, it could be a very real hedge against want. For everyone, it could be a hedge against distancing ourselves from our food, which can be the first step toward a diet low in the whole foods that virtually every public health authority tells us we should eat more of.
Really? A food source for the poor? People are going to be heading out with their burlap sacks collecting GMO chestnuts to roast, grind into flour or boil into candy? This is the answer to hunger? And what is the health impact of eating GMO chestnuts? Is this even being assessed? No.
By Beverly Bell, Other Worlds, October 14, 2014
October 16 is World Food Day. To ensure that there is food for the world, and that it is not controlled by corporations, small farmers and allies across the globe have also named October 16 the Day of Action for Food Sovereignty and against Transnational Organizations. A posting by La Via Campesina, the coalition of more than 160 peasants and small-farmer movements across continents, says that it “organizes this day of solidarity, resistance, and mobilisation in order to make citizens aware of the current threats to peoples’ food sovereignty.” (To find out about U.S. actions for this day, click here.)
Food sovereignty is the concept that every people has the right to make decisions about, produce, and consume its own local, healthy, culturally appropriate food. Food sovereignty is based in an expansive set of ecological and agricultural practices, international trade laws, and domestic governmental policies.