Trial Begins For Dutch Cove Guardian Erwin Vermeulen in Taiji, Japan

Video of dolphin slaughter below article

Note:  Whether one likes the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society and their allies or not, here is another case of a photographer stopped for trying to document reality.  That reality was the slaughter of dolphins.  Erwin was in Taiji attempting to document the town’s annual dolphin massacre, which runs from September until March, in an effort to bring global awareness to this slaughter. Whether covering war, or the destruction of the Earth and its inhabitants, those complicit (the 1%) do not want the truth seen by the rest of us.  If documentary photographers, filmakers and journalists are prevented from capturing the facts, we all lose.  As long as injustice continues, however, concerned people will take risks to record its harsh realities in order to inform the rest of the world.

At the end of this article is a video of a past mass dolphin killing in Taiji. WARNING: Please be aware that it is graphic.-Orin Langelle for the GJEP Team

Erwin with Otis: Otis was a rescue from a cruelty situation.

The prosecution presents their case

Cross-posted from Sea Shepherd

Thursday January 26 marked the start of court proceedings for Dutch Cove Guardian Erwin Vermeulen, who has been detained for more than 40 days on false charges of assault. Erwin was in Taiji documenting the town’s annual dolphin massacre, which runs from September until March, in an effort to bring global awareness to this horrific slaughter, when he was falsely accused of pushing one of the dolphin resort employees.

Sea Shepherd Conservation Society had a definitive presence in the courtroom. Board Director Dr. Bonny Shumaker and Sea Shepherd Netherlands Director Geert Vons made the trip to Japan to support Erwin. Also in attendance were Cove Guardian campaign leader, Scott West, as well as 5 volunteers; none were allowed contact with Erwin.

Until last week, Erwin was being held in the Shingu jail, near Taiji. He has now been transferred to Wakayama, where the trial will take place. Erwin has been kept under solitary conditions and was not told what charges he was being held on until his transfer last week. He has been denied contact with anyone in the outside world including loved ones and fellow Sea Shepherd volunteers. He has been refused any reading material while detained and has been subject to continual interrogation.

Even more shocking is the fact that while in Shingu, Erwin was fed a diet of mostly-if not all- white rice and his requests for nutritional supplements were denied.

The Dolphin Resort trainer who accused Erwin of pushing him gave his statement before the judge. The trainer claims Erwin pushed him in the chest area. The accuser’s account of the incident appeared to be inconsistent with the written statement he provided to the police a few days after the alleged incident. The prosecution went so far as to try and obtain DNA evidence to prove Erwin touched the man. Police collected “foreign matters” from around the trainer’s chest, but the DNA test was negative.  This test was presented in court and proved, even scientifically, that there was no contact between the two men.

After the accuser gave his statement, Erwin took the stand looking visibly thinner, fatigued, and had not been provided with a haircut or shave while detained.

The prosecution began by attempting to trick Erwin into making harmful remarks about Sea Shepherd; these attempts failed.  He maintains that he had no contact with the trainer and that his hands were full carrying a tripod, camera, and communication radio- leaving no free hand for him to push the man. In his recounting of events, Erwin said he passed a so-called roadblock and that the trainer was on his cell phone and did not even notice him until he was 20 meters past the barricade. Shortly afterwards the Taiji police arrived. Erwin stated that at the time they did not mention anything about the alleged assault, only that he had crossed a no trespassing sign. Only some time later after the Wakayama police and the accuser spent more time conversing, and Erwin and the rest of the Cove Guardians were preparing to leave, did the police inform Erwin that the trainer was claiming he had been pushed.

The prosecution proceeded to bring up irrelevant accusation of trespassing and how taking photos of people who don’t want to be photographed is offensive. Erwin’s reply was “Yes, well I am offended by the dolphin slaughter. It’s not a crime to offend, but I’m not here for photos or trespassing, I’m here for pushing.” He also pointed out to the court that the Cove Guardians have a silent agreement with the police “when we see a sign, we enter once and the English speaking police will tell us if it’s legal or not. The locals always ignore the signs, only they are never reprimanded.”

During the court proceeding Erwin alludes to the conditions inside his jail cell. He was asked to put on the jacket he was wearing during the alleged crime, as a reenactment for the court. Erwin remarked “I wish I had this in my cell because it’s freezing in there.” When the court was considering taking a break for dinner Erwin said, “ I don’t need to eat. It’s nice and warm in here. This is the first time in two weeks that I’ve been warm.”

It is important to remember that Erwin Vermeulen is being held on charges of simple assault, due to an accusation that he merely pushed another person, and is being subjected to highly inhumane conditions. The conviction rate in Japanese courts is 99% and most detainees confess very quickly. It is easy to see why, after learning of the subpar conditions Erwin is being subjected to inside the Japanese prison system. Through the course of his imprisonment and harsh treatment, Erwin has maintained his innocence and Sea Shepherd will do everything in our power to see him free and justice served.

The trial continues February 1st when the defense will present their case and a Sea Shepherd witness will be allowed to give a testimony. Closing arguments are scheduled for February 16th with a verdict on February 22nd, meaning Erwin will spend another month in jail on a ludicrous charge. If convicted Erwin could face up to two years in prison along with a large fine.

Following the court proceedings, Sea Shepherd Netherlands Director Geert Vons had the following statement:

“Erwin Vermeulen has now become a trump card in the dispute between Japan and the Netherlands over whaling. Sea Shepherd’s ships are registered in the Netherlands and every year when the whale hunt starts Japan complains to the Netherlands about environmental activists hindering its whale hunters.

The charges against Erwin were only clearly stated on Saturday. He is being treated like a notorious criminal. He is not allowed any contact with the outside world, or any letters. It is a very, very sad story. I had expected more support from the Dutch Government, for a Dutch national.”

According to the Dutch Animal Rights Party, Foreign Affairs Minister Uri Rosenthal is “not doing enough” and they want a debate about the issue in the Lower House. According to Esther Ouwehand, one of the party’s two members of parliament, Japan has a reputation for arresting activists who it regards as “hindering” whale hunts for political reasons. Ouwehand wants Rosenthal to summon the Japanese ambassador.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Actions, Independent Media, politics, Videos

The ‘wind rush’: Green energy blows trouble into Mexico

A few months ago, I received a call from a reporter at the Christian Science Monitor, who’d been referred to me, he said, because of my experience in Mexico, and because I’ve been working, with Global Justice Ecology Project, on exposing the problems that can accompany apparently ‘green’ development – specifically REDD, the Clean Development Mechanism, Biofuels, and carbon trading. The reporter was researching an article on wind farms on the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, in the Mexican state of Oaxaca. He’d heard rumors, he told me, that there was a downside to these wind farms, but he hadn’t yet gotten hold of anyone who could clearly explain why in the world – aside from the standard concerns of bird-deaths and noise pollution – anyone would oppose wind power.

I told him I’d heard of the Oaxaca project, and was aware there were big issues, and I referred him to some sources in Mexico, including Wendy Call, whose terrific book on Tehuantepec, No Word for Welcome, I recently reviewed for Orion Magazine.

I said I had no personal connection to the Tehuantepec wind project but I would hazard a guess that the issue was this: who gets the electricity, and who pays the social costs? Do the local farmers and fishers want enormous turbines installed on their ancestral lands? What happens when big, moneyed interests colonize an area where the culture has been relatively intact for centuries?

As we spoke, I went online to search who would own the electricity from the wind farms, and what I found essentially answers all of these questions: the biggest shares of investment in the project, and the biggest shares of energy coming out of it, belong to Walmart and Coca-Cola. From a point of view that questions the need, at this stage in the deepening climate crisis, for more crap plastic products and more hyped-up sugar water, that says it all.

The CSM reporter, Erik Vance, did find what he was looking for, and has just produced several in-depth articles on “the wind rush”, including the very illuminating and well-considered article one we cross-post below.  – Jeff Conant, for Global Justice Ecology Project

The ‘wind rush’: Green energy blows trouble into Mexico

    • Green energy’s big success is a rude awakening in the isthmus of Mexico.

By Erik Vance, Correspondent

January 26, 2012 – The Isthmus of Tehuantapec, Mexico‘s narrowest point, is a powerful wind tunnel of air currents whipping through the mountains that separate the Pacific and Atlantic oceans. Here, on the Pacific side, the wind shapes everything from the miles-long sandspits of Laguna Superior to the landscapes of the indigenous people’s hearts.

Howling constantly through thatched roofs, the wind is powerful enough at times to support a grown man leaning back as if in a chair. Gales average 19 miles per hour, slapping waves over the bows of fishing skiffs and sandblasting anyone standing on the beach.

The wind is “sacred” in this village, says indigenous Huave fisherman Donaciano Victoria. “We believe that the wind from the north is like a man and the wind from the south is like a woman. And so you must not disrespect the wind.”

To read the rest of the article, go to The Christian Science Monitor.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Change, Independent Media, Posts from Jeff Conant, Latin America, Energy, False Solutions to Climate Change

First Nations Unite in Opposition to Enbridge Tarsands Pipeline

Indigenous Environmental Network

“A network of Indigenous Peoples empowering Indigenous Nations and communities towards sustainable livelihoods, demanding environmental justice and maintaining the Sacred Fire of our traditions.”

First Nations in Alberta & Northwest Territories sign Save the Fraser Declaration opposing the proposed Enbridge Pipeline and Tankers project

January 27, 2012

Edmonton – This afternoon, First Nations from Alberta & the Northwest Territories added their names and support to a formal declaration opposing the Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline and supertankers project.  In signing the Save the Fraser Declaration – a formal legal declaration that protects the world’s most critical salmon rivers, and the Pacific North Coast, from the threat of oil spills posed by the proposed Enbridge oil pipeline and supertankers.

-
The Yinka Dene Alliance, which is made up of 6 Nations (Nadleh Whut’en, Saik’uz, Takla Lake, Nak’azdli, Wet’suwet’en and Tlazt’en Nations) in northern British Columbia led the creation of the Declaration in 2010. Since then, First Nations signing onto this opposition of the proposed Enbridge pipeline and tankers has snowballed to more than 100 First Nations in BC, Alberta and the NWT.

Members of the Yinka Dene Alliance including Chief Jackie Thomas traveled to Edmonton for a signing ceremony to welcome the support of Alberta & NWT Nations. “The Harper government has made clear that they plan to ram the Enbridge pipeline and tankers through. He wants to sacrifice First Nations once again for this tar sands poison,” said Chief Jackie Thomas of Saik’uz First Nation. “We will stop them.”

The signing of this Declaration comes after a long week of Chiefs, Elders and community leaders from various communities presenting oral evidence to the Enbridge Joint Review Panel here in Edmonton. Testimony given by various communities in Alberta echoed Nations in BC and outlined the serious concerns many First Nation communities have about the proposed route of the pipeline and its close proximity to waterways, culturally-sensitive areas and traditional hunting, fishing and gathering sites in the province.

Alberta First Nations affected by tar sands developments – and also living downstream of the proposed Enbridge pipeline route and possible pipeline oil spills – committed to helping the Yinka Dene Alliance and BC First Nations to protect their lands.
“As a community being impacted by rapid tar sands development in the Alberta we support the Yinka Dene Alliance and understand the importance of protecting sacred waterways from the dangers of this pipeline,” stated Chief Allan Adam of the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation. “Our community has seen the devastating impacts of tar sands projects and we truly hope that our brothers and sisters in the Fraser River do not suffer the same fate.”

The Save the Fraser Declaration recognizes the connection to tar sands expansion projects and criticizes the federal process to approve the pipeline. The Declaration states, “This project would link the Tar Sands to Asia through our territories and the headwaters of this great river, and the federal process to approve it, violate our laws, traditions, values and our inherent rights as Indigenous Peoples under international law…”

“Our downstream communities have already experienced impacts from the ruptured Enbridge Norman Wells pipeline in the NWT, which is still being cleaned,” stated Dene National Chief Bill Erasmus. “A rupture in the Northern Gateway pipeline could also affect us because the water comes north. People in the north get their drinking water directly from the rivers and streams.”

New Signatories to the Declaration include Dene Nation, Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation, Swan River First Nation, Smith’s Landing First Nation, Katlodeeche First Nation, Liidlii Kue First Nation, Deh Gah Got’ie First Nation, and Deh Cho First Nations.

1 Comment

Filed under Indigenous Peoples, Climate Change, Climate Justice, Forests and Climate Change, Water, Tar Sands, Energy

Second Attempt: Formal Complaint Filed Against UN Security Actions in Durban

Hand of the unidentified UN security guard smashing my camera into my face because I took a photograph of him escorting a UN accredited delegate dressed as a clown out of the UN compound after the clown spoke at a press conference and was being interviewed by media. Photo: Langelle/GJEP

Note: On 16 December 2011 I filed a Formal Complaint Filed Against UN Security Actions in Durban, South Africa during the UN climate talks held there; specifically about an incident regarding  an unidentified uniformed officer. The officer shoved my camera into my face to prevent me from documenting the detention and expulsion of a UN-accredited delegate that occurred on 8 December 2011.  I was covering the UN climate talks and was officially accredited by the UN as media on assignment for Z Magazine.On 20 December 2011 I received an email from Elke Hoekstra, UN Communications and Knowledge Management, stating that my complaint was received and “We will look into this matter and come back to you in due course.” Today I contacted Ms Hoekstra via an email below.  Orin Langelle

Dear Ms Hoekstra,

On 16 December 2011 I lodged a formal complaint against the UNFCCC for the treatment I received from one unidentified uniformed officer just after noon on 8 December 2011 during COP 17 in Durban, South Africa.  I was officially accredited by the UNFCCC during COP 17 as media.  I was on assignment for Z Magazine.

On 20 December 2011 you replied to that complaint, “We will look into this matter and come back to you in due course.”

It has now been over a month since I filed my complaint and I feel that the UNFCCC has not responded to me in “due course.”

Please take notice, that I am contacting my attorney in regards to filing a legal charge of assault against the unidentified uniformed officer.

I would hope that the UNFCCC takes this matter seriously now and responds immediately to my complaint.

Sincerely,

Orin Langelle

Langelle Photo

P.O. Box  412  Hinesburg, VT  05461  U.S.  GMT -5:00

Member of the National Writers Union and the International Federation of Journalists

Leave a Comment

Filed under Actions, Climate Change, Durban/COP-17, politics, UNFCCC

Aboriginal groups labelled “adversaries” by Canadian Government: leaked document exposes

Cross-Posted from the UK Tar Sands Network

Enbridge hearings and Enemies of the State

Since Obama gave Harper the cold shoulder last week on plans to send tar sands oil to the Gulf of Mexico via the Keystone XL Pipeline, all eyes have been on British Columbia. Public hearings are currently taking place on the proposed Enbridge Northern Gateway pipeline, which will decide if tar sands oil will be pumped all the way through the vulnerable ecosystem of North-West Canada, then shipped in massive tankers across some of the roughest waters, to China. This monster project has united indigenous communities, local residents and environmentalists in opposition, and caused Joe Oliver, Canada’s Natural Resources Minister, to come out all guns blazing, accusing ‘foreign radicals’ of interfering in the hearings.

Yesterday, leaked government documents revealed that the Canadian government has declared First Nations, green groups and local and European media as ‘enemies of the state‘. Despite all this intimidation, First Nations communities are standing strong. 61 indigenous nations have signed onto the Save the Fraser Declaration opposing the pipeline, and are voicing their concerns proud and clear at the hearings. Stay tuned for updates ontwitter and facebook!

Aboriginal groups labelled “adversaries” by federal government: document

Cross-Posted from APTN National News
OTTAWA–
Aboriginal groups are seen as “adversaries” in the public relations battle over the tar sands, an internal government document revealed.

The document also identified the federal department of Aboriginal Affairs as an ally in the Harper government’s quest to improve the image of Alberta’s controversial tar sands development.

Federal ministers on Thursday immediately tried to distance themselves from the document, titled Pan-European Oil-Sands Advocacy Strategy, and dated March 2011.

The document, obtained by the Climate Action Network Canada under the Access to Information Act, surfaced Thursday on the heels of a Crown-First Nations gathering which saw the Harper government and First Nations chiefs, through the Assembly of First Nations, agree to joint plan to begin discussing a host of issues that have defied resolution for years.

The gathering was hailed as ushering in a “new day” in the relationship between Canada and First Nations by Prime Minister Stephen Harper.

The document, which was contained in an email sent by Kumar Gupta, a diplomat based in London, outlined a strategy for the Canadian government to execute in order to counter the negative publicity tar sands development has garnered in Europe.

The strategy document also identified First Nations as “influencers” in the battle over the tar sands, along with provincial and federal governments, energy companies and associations. The strategy also aimed to increase understanding among European “stakeholders” of Canada’s and Alberta’s consultation with First Nations and that both governments were working to “address” health concerns linked to the tar sands, the document states.

The decision to put Aboriginal groups under a list of “adversaries,” while the federal Aboriginal Affairs department was placed under a list of “allies,” however, reveals the true colours of the Conservative government, said Clayton Thomas-Muller, with the Indigenous Environment Network.

“It’s just another example of how the federal government went into (the Crown-First Nations Gathering) in bad faith,” said Thomas-Muller. “This government continues to try and erode the collective bargaining rights First Nations have as first peoples of this land and continues to label us as stakeholders when, in fact, we are priority rights holders.”

Thomas-Muller said the document also shows the government is concerned about the growing “Indigenous rights movement,” which he said has increasing clout.

“We have a generation of young people that are coming up that are more educated than any generation since colonization,” he said. “We have (AFN National Chief) Shawn Atleo sitting there at the meeting and negotiating how we as First Nations can participate in an economy that will result in the destruction and desecration of our homeland. We need to come up with a new path.”

A spokesperson for Aboriginal Affairs said the department had no comment because the file was in the hands of Natural Resources Canada.

An AFN spokesperson said the organization would “not be providing any comments on this topic.”

The National Energy Board, which is the independent body tasked with approving or rejecting energy projects, was also listed as an ally in the document.

Environment Minister Peter Kent told Postmedia Thursday that the government does not use the labels of “allies” or “adversaries.” Kent said Canada uses arguments based on “facts and science” to promote Alberta bitumen.

“I think that’s a gross mischaracterization of reality,” said Kent.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Change, Energy, Forests and Climate Change, Indigenous Peoples, Political Repression, Tar Sands, Water

The Dirty Truth Behind I-Phones: Should consumers boycott Apple?

Note: Corporate globalization rears its ugly head once again–Even supposedly progressive Apple succumbs to its allure.  System change anyone?  1% vs 99%?  How about .01% vs 99.99%…

–The GJEP Team

Cross-Posted from the LA Times Opinion, January 26, 2012 |

Foxconn

Photo: A representative from Foxconn Technology Group speaks to applicants outside the computer component maker's plant in Shenzhen last year. Credit: Associated Press

Apple’s profits may have soared last quarter, with revenue up 74% (to $46.3 billion), but I wonder how celebratory they feel in Cupertino as reports emerge about the company’s business practices, specifically how it keeps production costs low so that it can “make a 60%, 70% margin per phone” sold?

In the last few days, the New York Times has published bombshell reports (“How the U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work,” “In China, Human Costs Are Built Into an iPad“) that expose the appalling working conditions at the Foxconn plant in Shenzhen, China, where Apple’s products are made. Here’s an excerpt describing the troubling environment:

[T]he workers assembling iPhones, iPads and other devices often labor in harsh conditions, according to employees inside those plants, worker advocates and documents published by companies themselves. Problems are as varied as onerous work environments and serious — sometimes deadly — safety problems.

Employees work excessive overtime, in some cases seven days a week, and live in crowded dorms. Some say they stand so long that their legs swell until they can hardly walk. Under-age workers have helped build Apple’s products, and the company’s suppliers have improperly disposed of hazardous waste and falsified records, according to company reports and advocacy groups that, within China, are often considered reliable, independent monitors.

More troubling, the groups say, is some suppliers’ disregard for workers’ health. Two years ago, 137 workers at an Apple supplier in eastern China were injured after they were ordered to use a poisonous chemical to clean iPhone screens. Within seven months last year, two explosions at iPad factories, including in Chengdu, killed four people and injured 77. Before those blasts, Apple had been alerted to hazardous conditions inside the Chengdu plant, according to a Chinese group that published that warning.

It should be noted:

–Apple is not alone among electronic companies employing Foxconn and other such plants.

–Apple has responded to scrutiny over workplace conditions by disclosing names of suppliers and manufacturing partners.

–If the New York Times’ anonymous sources are to be trusted, Apple execs don’t seem to care how the work gets done so long as it’s fast and cheap. Here are two unabashed (and nameless) quotes from the New York Times stories:

“The speed and flexibility is breathtaking,” the executive said. “There’s no American plant that can match that.” […]

“We shouldn’t be criticized for using Chinese workers,” a current Apple executive said. “The U.S. has stopped producing people with the skills we need.”

They should have just come out and said they’d rather not abide by U.S. regulations that protect worker rights — regulations that would slow down productivity and increase costs. (“By some estimates, each iPhone includes $190 in hardware costs, $10 in Chinese labor,” Scott Tong said onWednesday’s “Marketplace.”)

Earlier this month “This American Life” dedicated an entire episode to the issue of human rights abuses taking place at Foxconn. On the program, Mike Daisey performed from his one-man show, “The Agony and the Ecstasy of Steve Jobs,” in which he shares his experience from Shenzhen, where he went with the intention of learning about the people who made his beloved Apple products. Here’s an excerpt of his heartbreaking findings:

While I’m in-country, a worker at Foxconn dies after working a 34-hour shift. I wish I could say that’s exceptional, but it’s happened before. I only mention it because it actually happened while I was there.

And I go to the dormitories. I’m a valuable potential future customer. They will show me anything I ask to see. The dormitories are cement cubes, 12-foot by 12-foot. And in that space there are 13 beds, 14 beds. I count 15 beds. They’re stacked up like Jenga puzzle pieces all the way up to the ceiling. The space between them is so narrow, none of us would actually fit in them. They have to slide into them like coffins.

There are cameras in the rooms. There are cameras in the hallways. There are cameras everywhere. And why wouldn’t there be? You know, when we dream of a future where the regulations are washed away and the corporations are finally free to sail above us, you don’t have to dream about some sci-fi dystopian Blade Runner/1984bull [BLEEP]. You can go to Shenzhen tomorrow. They’re making your crap that way today.

When I leave the factory, as I can feel myself being rewritten from the inside out, the way I see everything is starting to change. I keep thinking, how often do we wish more things were handmade? Oh, we talk about that all the time, don’t we? “I wish it was like the old days. I wish things had that human touch.” But that’s not true. There are more handmade things now than there have ever been in the history of the world.

Everything is handmade. I know. I have been there. I have seen the workers laying in parts thinner than human hair. One after another after another. Everything is handmade.

Beyond the working conditions, Daisey also sheds light on an environment in which people live in fear and are eventually disposable. “And so when you start working at 15 or 16, by the time you are 26, 27, your hands are ruined,” he says. “And when they are truly ruined, once they will not do anything further, you know what we do with a defective part in a machine that makes machine. We throw it away.” And there’s no one to protect workers, he goes on, in this “fascist country run by thugs.”

“It’s barbaric,” the Daily Beast‘s Dan Lyons says bluntly. And it’s up to us, the consumers, to do something about it rather than turn a blind eye. He writes:

As the Times article points out, this isn’t just Apple. It’s every company. It’s every product we use. It’s our entire way of life, built on the backs of people who are being treated in ways that we would not allow ourselves or our countrymen to be treated.

Ultimately the blame lies not with Apple and other electronics companies — but with us, the consumers.

And ultimately we are the ones who must demand change.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Corporate Globalization, Pollution

The War Against Peasant Farmers Heats Up in Honduras

A Climate Connections Exclusive Report

The Bajo Aguán Region of Honduras competes with the Caribbean and Pacific coasts of Colombia for the site with the most egregious violations of human rights, land rights, and ecological justice that often accompany biofuel plantations in the tropics. This article I wrote for Alternet last year documents the relation of these abuses to the UN-backed Clean Development Mechanism. Since that time, the rate of assassinations, disappearances, and outright attacks on peasant farmers has increased dramatically. Climate Connections is pleased to offer the following original article reporting from the ground on the current state of affairs in the Bajo Aguan.

– Jeff Conant, for Global Justice Ecology Project.

Solidarity in the Heart of the Aguán: The War Against Peasant Farmers Heats Up in Honduras

Young girl in Bajo Aguan; Photo credit: Greg McCain

By Aryeh Shell

“There is a war here in the Aguán,” says Juan, surveying the distant fields of African palm from the vantage point of his recently planted field of beans and corn. A young Honduran farmer, wearing a beaten cowboy hat and a bandana bearing the name “National Front for Popular Resistance,” Juan lives in an encampment of 60 families, dedicated to growing basic grains and reclaiming their food sovereignty. “But the war is not against the drug traffickers, other countries or even organized crime,” he says. “It is a war against the campesinos.”

In the Lower Aguán River Valley in northern Honduras, more than 3,000 families have claimed their right to the basic necessities of a dignified life: land, food, health, education. Living in make-shift tarps and temporary thatch-roofed huts, with nothing but machetes to clear the land, they daily face off against the goliath forces of the Honduran oligarchy, their private guards, and 1,000 Honduran military and police forces deployed by the coup regime to militarize the region – the local security apparatus of big business and the State.

The second major military here, “Operation Xatruch II,” was launched in August, 2011 with financing and training by the United States government. Honduran Security Minister, Oscar Alvarez justified the militarization of the region by describing the campesinos as “so-called farmers and possibly drug dealers who are wanting to settle in that area”.

But these “so-called farmers” are not just arriving. They were recruited by the State into this backwater rainforest region in the 60s and 70s through agrarian land reforms that granted collective titles to peasant cooperatives. The reformist program used campesino labor to cultivate the land and grow African Palm for export. The land was inalienable,  designated solely for small-holder production.

The aggressive neoliberal policies of the 90s and the country’s Agriculture Modernization Act of 1992 definitively ended land reform in Honduras and opened up collectively-held land to the market. Vulnerable to global economic forces, cheap imports from the North, massive debt, and a campaign of intimidation, many farmers were forced to sell their land for a mere 1,000 lempiras per manzana (about $52 US dollars for 1.7 acres). Forty peasant cooperatives disappeared. The land was rapidly concentrated into the hands of three powerful landowners, Miguel Facussé, Rene Morales and Reynaldo Carnales.

Realizing they had been swindled, the movement began to occupy and reclaim their lands. Before the coup took place on June 28,2009, President Zelaya, affectionately known as Mel by his campesino supporters, sat down with the Aguán farmers to redistribute disputed land and resolve the conflicts. Decree 18-2008 would grant titles for land that had been peacefully occupied for 10 years. The farmers were within days of receiving their titles when the coup took place. But the decree was abolished as one of the first acts undertaken by de facto President Roberto Micheletti and the coup regime. In December 2009, the United Campesino Movement of the Aguán (MUCA), decided to reestablish its nonviolent land occupations.

Welcome to Liberated Territory; Photo Credit: Greg McCain

While public officials and the Honduran press have used allegations of armed guerrilla activity or drug trafficking to criminalize the peasant farmers, they have failed to report on the 55 campesino leaders selectively assassinated, or the countless others who have been disappeared, captured, tortured and intimidated since January 2010.

They also have neglected to expose the narco-trafficking activities of the region’s largest landowner, Miguel Facussé, whose cocaine import business is well-known by the US Embassy, as revealed by Wikileaks cables last year.

Facussé and his company, Grupo Dinant, have received millions of dollars in loans by international financial institutions to promote African palm oil biofuel production. While being promoted as a green energy solution, the profits of Grupo Dinant are being used to pay armed paramilitaries and private guards to terrorize peasant farmers in order to drive them from their land, resulting in grave human rights violations – not to mention the severe ecological damage through mono-cultivation, water depletion and contamination from heavy toxic chemical inputs.

According to Dana Frank, a history professor at UC Santa Cruz and a regular contributor to The Nation, “The U.S. is funding and training Honduran military and police that are conducting joint operations with the security guards of a known drug trafficker to violently repress a campesino movement on behalf of Miguel Facussé’s dubious claims to vast swaths of the Aguán Valley, in order to support his African palm biofuels empire.”

Human Rights Delegation

On January 6-15, I joined a dozen other  US and Canadian citizens on a delegation to the Aguán organized by Rights Action, Alliance for Global Justice, and Food First, to accompany campesino communities defending their rights to land, and to hear their testimonies.

Our hotel was filled with camouflaged soldiers carrying military rifles, ignoring signs on the restaurant doors prohibiting weapons. Day and night, the streets were patrolled by large green pickup trucks with tinted windows and without license plates – known locally as the kind used by paramilitaries in drive-by shootings and political kidnappings. I did not feel more secure by their presence.

After driving down long dirt roads, through oceans of dust-covered palm trees, and passing several military checkpoints along the way, we arrived in the small village of Rigores, a farming community of 135 families who were violently forced off their land by security forces last June. The police destroyed their crops and set fire to their homes, schools, and church. They are slowly rebuilding their community under the constant threat that the police will evict them again.

Norma, a shy woman cradling a newborn baby in her arms, showed us her newly rebuilt home of dry cracked mud. Norma doesn’t sleep much, she told us, because she is fearful for the day the police will return.

Norma and her rebuilt home, Bajo Aguan, January 2012; Photo credit: Aryeh Shell

She described the day when they attacked the community and burned their homes to the ground: “When they came to capture the men, I begged them to leave us alone. I told them, we are not guerrillas, we don’t have any weapons. We are women. We are farmers. They pointed their guns at me and told me to shut up or they would kill me. My baby was only 40 days old. She was screaming. I ran into the palm trees to escape.”

In a cramped room we gathered to hear other testimonies. Children lined up along the windows, peering in at the strange group of gringos in bright blue International Human Rights Observer T-shirts. At first, people were shy to share the trauma of the police attack. But before long, the stories poured out.

Rodolfo, a leader in the Campesino Movement of the Aguán, began, “Our community has been heavily persecuted. Many people have been kidnapped. Some have been beaten, and injured, including my 16-year-old son who was captured. They doused him with gasoline and threatened to set him on fire.”

A boisterous woman named Maria stood up. “It was a terrifying experience. Everyone had to leave their homes running. They burned our houses and killed our animals. It left us with a psychological trauma. My son is still really scared. Whenever he hears a noise, he says, ‘the police are coming, the police are coming’.

Despite the trauma of the eviction and ongoing repression, most of the families have returned, even more determined to claim their right to plant corn, beans, and yucca.

Rodolfo concluded, “They haven’t succeeded in breaking us. We continue to resist.”

As we walked through the rubble of the village that once was Rigores, small green cornstalks were poking through patches of earth.

Hut, Bajo Aguan, January 2102; Photo credit: Aryeh Shell

True Security

The campesino cooperatives are working to redefine the very notion of security – not through increased militarization, but through integral agrarian reform and food sovereignty. This includes not only land titles, but also technical support, native seeds, favorable credit, dignified permanent housing, schools, healthcare and the autonomy to decide what they will produce. It includes securing the rights and participation of women and youth. The first point on their security agenda, however, is to unite.

When asked what it would take to create true security in the region, Wilfredo Paz, the coordinator of the new Permanent Human Rights Observatory in the Aguán, responded, “There is one fundamental requirement, and that is the solidarity and love that we have for our brothers and sisters. Here in the Aguán, there is no guarantee of life. There is no respect for human rights. Here the only law that is respected is that of the military, of the powerful landowners and their hired assassins. Neoliberalism and the oligarchy want us to be divided. If we don’t create a collective strategy, we won’t survive.”

We attended a Campesino Congress that brought together nearly seventy leaders to discuss their strategy. The meeting started with a full minute of applause – a collective ritual to recognize the martyrs of the movement. During the long minute, my hands burned and my eyes filled with tears for all the blood that has been spilt in the struggle, in defense of our mother earth.

Odelfo, Bajo Aguan, January 2012; Photo credit: Greg McCain

The first agreement of the meeting was to unify the campesino organizations. The peasant farmer movement in the Aguán is striking at the core of capitalism, and solidarity is at the heart of their movement. As Odelfo, a 79-year-old campesino, puts it, “Todos para uno y uno para todos. Para que todos de una tortilla la compartamos, y que comamos de una misma tortilla todos” – All for one and one for all, because we all share the same tortilla.

Aryeh Shell is a cultural activist and a Rotary World Peace Fellow, currently studying International Relations in Argentina.  She is researching the vibrant Honduran movement of resistance to neoliberal development projects. 

If you are interested in joining an International Gathering for Human Rights in Solidarity with Honduras, February 17-20th, 2012, supportong the Human Rights Observatory with urgently needed resources, or would like to participate in a Solidarity Brigade, please contact:  mioaguan2012@gmail.com or brigada.solidaridad.aguan@gmail.com

For further information: http://www.mioaguan.blogspot.com/

2 Comments

Filed under Bioenergy / Agrofuels, Climate Justice, False Solutions to Climate Change, Independent Media, Land Grabs, Latin America, New Voices in the News, Political Repression

BREAKING NEWS: Protesters Pack Wisconsin State Capitol to Oppose Mining Bill

Protesters, led by a Native American flash mob, are packing the Wisconsin State Capitol right now to oppose a strip mining bill that woul ddestroy pristine watersheds. Watch live here: Live-stream from Indian Country TV. — GJEP

Cross-posted from The Daily Isthmus:

Protesters converge at Wisconsin Capitol over mining bill and State of the State address
by Austin Duerst

Thursday 01/26/2012 12:21 pm – Protesters gathered at the Wisconsin Capitol on Wednesday to voice their opposition the state’s controversial mining bill and the State of the State address by Gov. Scott Walker.

The Assembly is set to take up AB 426, which would streamline Wisconsin’s mining permit process and clear the way for Gogebic Taconite to open an iron mine in north-central Wisconsin.

An evening rally held outside the State Street entrance to the Capitol featured Secretary of State Doug La Follette, former Department of Natural Resources secretary George Meyer, and Ojibwe elder Joe Rose, who explained his people’s spiritual connection to the land where the mining would be conducted. Contamination of the region’s water, he said, would have drastic effects on residents and crops. As he spoke, murmurs of disgust rose from the crowd.

“On this day, we can’t put a price on the wild rice or any of the other resources that a hunter-gathering society would use,” Rose said, “and that’s why this mine is not going to happen.”

Protesters waved signs bearing slogans such as “Leave Mother Earth Alone” and “Bury the Bill: Lake Superior holds 10% of the world’s fresh water.” Drums and chanting followed like the preamble to an epic charge.

Later in the evening, more protesters assembled inside the Capitol for the State of the State by Gov. Walker, clearly hoping it would be his last annual address from that office. Whistles, jeers and cries bounced around the walls in the Rotunda. No doubt used to the protests by now, the police officers seemed eerily calm.

In the minutes before Walker’s speech, which started shortly after 7 p.m. in the packed Assembly chambers, the crowd sang and raised their signs. One showed Earth sitting uncomfortably close to a ball of flames; hovering in a black abyss next to the planet stood a smiley-faced creature with an extended hand bearing a peace sign, with the words “Have Some Respect!” written above it.

The poster’s creator, Girard Gorelick, is an Environmental Studies major at UW-Madison. “The issue of the environment is one that rings deeply within me, because I think it extends beyond politics,” he said. “It’s an issue of being a living part of the community, and I believe what is at stake is something that all people face and need to face together.”

Walking amidst the crowd in neon-colored vests, volunteers with the American Civil Liberties Union served as legal observers and keepers of the peace, seeking to ensure that authorities treated protesters legally. Earlier in the evening, there was a brief altercation outside the Capitol when a protester got into a tussle with a man trying to take a “Recall Walker” sign. No arrests were made, the ACLU members said, and the potentially violent episode was dealt with swiftly.

Stacy Harbaugh, communications director for the ACLU of Wisconsin, noted that police weren’t enforcing many of the rules regarding protests. For example, forbidden balloons and musical instruments abounded. Several people sounded off on retractable plastic horns they’d snuck into the building. One man walked right past a police officer shaking cowbells. Another blew loudly into a kazoo.

Harbaugh pointed to the stadium-sized banners hanging over the second-floor railings. “According to the rules, signs are supposed to be held by people’s hands,” she said, “but those are being held by strings attached to weights.”

As Walker’s speech began, the clamor from the crowd was deafening. It was as if the governor was seeking to impose his own view of Wisconsin’s recent history, and the people in the Rotunda would not bear to hear it.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Change, Indigenous Peoples, New Voices in the News, Videos, Water

Genetic Engineering Gets Extreme. Now Comes Synthetic Genetic Modification

The San Francisco Chronicle’s January 23rd article, “UC picks Richmond for Lawrence Berkeley lab campus” praises the possible benefits of the expanded Lawrence Berkeley National Lab may bring to the city of Richmond.  But Richmond residents may be surprised  to discover that a high-risk facility working with a new set of potentially dangerous, insufficiently regulated technologies has just been invited into their community.

Much of the research to be conducted in the lab will be about an emerging technology — synthetic biology. Synthetic biology is an extreme form of genetic engineering, attempts to create self-replicating organisms with synthesized DNA – organisms not previously found in nature. The risks this research poses to worker safety, public health, and the environment are poorly studied and poorly regulated.

This article, cross-posted from Gaia Health, cites some of the concerns about synthetic biology, and refers back to an article I posted here last week.  — Jeff Conant, for GJEP

Baby, Genetically EngineeredGenetic Engineering Gets Extreme. Now Comes Synthetic Genetic Modification

You thought genetically modified organisms could be dangerous? Hold on, because synthetic genetic engineering is taking it to a whole new level. It goes beyond inserting genes from one life into another by manufacturing DNA never imagined in nature—by creating synthetic DNA from non-living materials.

SynBio

Synthetic genetic engineering – synthetic biology or SynBio – is, literally, the creation of synthetic life. It’s the manufacture of lifeforms or the modification of living organisms using non-biological materials. It’s a step beyond genetic engineering, in which the DNA from one organism is implanted into another. The DNA itself may be manufactured, literally created in a lab.

SynBio is, in fact, a combination of several technologies and types of science, including biology, chemistry, physics, computer science, nanotechnology, and engineering.

It’s also, in line with computer science, sometimes called bio-hacking, a term that evokes much of what it’s about. The purpose is to decrypt the biological code so that it can be redirected to other uses—a bit like breaking into a computer, taking control of its processor, and giving it directions to do something different from its original purpose.

In Climate Connections, Jeff Conant describes it like this:

Synthetic DNA is used to fabricate biological building blocks – often called “BioBrick” – capable of being combined in many different ways. “Parts” are assembled into “circuits” which are inserted into a “chassis” to create designer microbial factories that can be “booted up” to manufacture proteins or detect molecules that nature herself may never have dreamed up.

SynBio is the act of treating life as if it were simply a form of mechanical object.

Separation from Reality

The Lie at the Heart of Making Biofuel from Sea Algae” reports on an extreme disconnect from reality. Yasuo Yoshikuni, the CEO of a company that hopes to sell its genetically engineered bacteria to eat brown sea algae and excrete ethanol, makes the nonsensical claim that brown sea algae will absorb the effluent from factory farms. As that article explains, the truth is the opposite: Brown sea algae is killed by agribusiness effluent. To be able to make such a claim requires divorce from reality.

That is the true danger of SynBio. The belief that we humans—or at least those few who are among the chosen or developers of technology—are exempt from the laws of nature. The belief that we can behave as if we have no connection to the planet from which we come is the worst kind of hubris. We’re seeing it already in genetic engineering.

Known Risks of Genetic Engineering

Genetically modified corn is an endocrine disruptor. It’s causing infertility to the point of destroying Agribusiness’ pig factory farms, severely harming cattle reproduction, and is strongly suspected in human fertility problems. Genetically modified crops are failing suddenly. Superweeds, a direct result of genetically modified crops, grow to huge sizes and at accelerated rates. Genetically modified foods are literally changing us by changing our gut biota. Farmers in India are committing suicide in the thousands because they’ve lost their ability to farm after trying genetically modified crops. The toxins from genetically modified foods are showing up in virtually all pregnant women and their fetuses.

These are all unintended effects of genetic engineering. Yet, the promoters of it wear blinders to the damage. They hide behind the profanity of misused science.  They make claims like, “No one has ever proven …” In their arrogance, they completely ignore the Precautionary Principle.

The Unknown Risks

What might be the unintended consequences of genetic engineering’s offsping, SynBio?

We.Don’t.Know.

And that, of course, is the problem. We’re just beginning to see the extent of the harms in genetic modification. Warnings were given. Studies were done. But they were ignored in favor of fraudulent industry-controlled fabrications. For the most part, they still are. Those paying attention are not the regulators, who have been bought out by the profiteers.

The Money

There’s serious money behind SynBio. Pouring resources into are primarily the Big Three of Big Pharma, Big Chemistry, and Big Oil. These are, of course, deeply interrelated arenas, as chemistry and pharmaceuticals both are tied to petroleum as the basis of the bulk of their products. So, what they’re doing is taking over and pushing the next big area of Big Business. (It should come as no surprise that the Bill Gates Foundation is right in there with them, by the way.)

It’s being pitched as “cool science”, described by Jeff Conant as:

… an enthralling world of lucrative, cutting edge research spearheaded by outsized young vanguardists sporting an aura of entrepreneurial genius, an element of mad scientist, and a dash of rock star.

All their energy is in service to the profits of multinational corporations. We should have no illusions about it. The entire field of SynBio is being harnessed to serve the interests of profits. Any benefits to humanity will exist only in terms of those profits. Any harms will be ignored and, as we’ve seen with genetic engineering, covered up.

Gaia Health is not against the concept of SynBio. It may be able to provide benefits to humanity. However, as it’s now constituted, that’s not its purpose. Its purpose is to create profits for multinational corporations. As we’ve seen again and again, when profits become the motivating force behind anything, then it’s routinely corrupted. The harms from pollution, distortion of society, alienation of people, loss of the natural world, and so much more are too high a price. As a rule, the benefits are seen only by the relatively wealthy of the world. The poor gain little and suffer greatly.

We all are suffering from the harms of genetic engineering, and virtually the only people benefitting from it are the elite—the one percenters who rake in the ill-gotten winnings. A benefit here and here may trickle down, but at a price that society needs to consider. The future of us all is hanging in the balance of genetic engineering alone. And now, we have SynBio bearing down on us, too.

What travesties might come of rampant SynBio? We don’t know. But we do know that, whatever they are, as long as SynBio is conjoined to profits, they won’t be considered.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Bioenergy / Agrofuels, Climate Change, Climate Justice, Energy, False Solutions to Climate Change, Genetic Engineering, Posts from Jeff Conant, synthetic biology

Real World Radio: Killings of Colombian Indigenous Peoples Denounced by Colombian National Indigenous Organization

Note: Under the so-called “Green Economy,” increasing demand for land for REDD forest carbon offsets as well as plantations of trees and crops to produce bioenergy will worsen the situation for Indigenous Peoples in Colombia and around the world.  To view our video on the impacts of REDD forest carbon offsets on Indigenous Peoples, click here.

–The GJEP Team

More murders and attacks against Colombian Indigenous Peoples signals ongoing pressure for land and resources

To listen to the radio program, click here: MP3 (1.8 MB)

The Colombian National Indigenous Organization (ONIC) made up by the native peoples of the country is denouncing and rejecting the serious attacks and human rights violations suffered by their communities. Several leaders were murdered these past days, following an end of 2011 and beginning of 2012 with many murders and attacks.

On January 15th, members of the Embera community Herminson and Alexander de Jesus Morales Zamora were murdered in Riosucio, Caldas department.

“We reject this act of violence and demand that our rights and integrity as human beings, as communities, as peoples representing different cultures are ensured”, reads a statement by the Indigenous Government Council of ONIC.

The denunciation by indigenous organizations is addressed to different justice and human rights advocacy groups, NGOs, the civil society and international organizations.

According to the statement, the Embera people is one of the most affected by the armed conflict in Colombia. According to authorities of the Indigenous Council Nuestra Señora Candelaria de la Montaña, Herminson and Alexander de Jesus Morales Zamora (29 and 24 years old respectively) disappeared on January 14th. They were members of the Ubarbá and El Rebaño communities. On January 16th, the families of the victims received a note indicating where they were. Their bodies were found n Cerro El Tigre, La Palma community, in a common burial site. They had been shot several times.

“ONIC and the Council denounce these violent acts against our indigenous population and the presence of armed groups outside the law in the communities, who murder and threaten the indigenous people”, reads the statement. “We ask the national authorities to ensure and protect our rights, our lives and integrity of the indigenous population”, read the statement.

A few days before, on January 12th, Jambalo Milciades Trochez Conda was murdered in Cauca department. “It’s not the first time our ancestral territories are attacked by armed groups operating in the region, and it is not the first time we mourn members of our families”, reads the statement.

Milciades was shot to death on his way to his car in Santander de Quilichao, in company of another community member. The 39-year-old indigenous leader lived in Loma Gruesa, Jambalo. He was married and he was the father of seven children. He was also an active member of the Indigenous Watch. According to people who witnessed the attack, the indigenous leader was attacked by people riding two motorbikes in Caloto municipality. He was shot ten times.

The Jambalo Indigenous Council and ACIN wrote that in 2001, Milciades was persecuted by armed groups of the Colombian Revolutionary Armed Forces (FARC). Since then, the leader received death threats by that group.

The Cauca Indigenous Regional Council (CRIC) and ACIN consider that it is extremely serious that the Colombian government hasn’t taken the necessary measures to protect the lives and integrity of the indigenous communities of the North of Cauca. There are precautionary measures in force granted by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IAHRC) due to the continuous threats and harassment suffered by these communities. The CRIC and ACIN demanded “immediate measures to ensure the right to life, the integrity and security of the indigenous community members of Cauca”.

The end of 2011 and the beginning of this year was as violent in the South of the country, according to information provided by the Indigenous Government Council of ONIC. On December 31st, in Santa Cruz de Guachavez municipality, Nariño, two gunmen murdered Jaime Chazatar, indigenous leader. A few days later, a member of the Awá people was tortured and then murdered, and three women from the same community, among them a 12-year-old, were raped. Other two leaders, Abran Mitis, from De los pastos town, and Hernando Chindoy, from Inga de Aponte, were attacked and “miraculously saved their lives”.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Biodiversity, Bioenergy / Agrofuels, Climate Change, Forests and Climate Change, Green Economy, Indigenous Peoples, Land Grabs, Latin America, Political Repression, REDD