Photo Essay by Orin Langelle
At the Cancún, Mexico United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) last year, journalist Jeff Conant and I learned that California’s then-Governor Arnold Swarzenegger had penned an agreement with Chiapas, Mexico’s Governor Juan Sabines as well as the head of the province of Acre, Brazil. This deal would provide carbon offsets from Mexico and Brazil to power polluting industries in California—industries that wanted to comply with the new California climate law (AB32) while continuing business as usual.
The plan was to use forests in the two Latin American countries to supposedly offset the emissions of the California polluters.
Conant and I took an investigative trip to Chiapas in March. When we arrived, we were invited by the people of Amador Hernandez–an indigenous village based in the Lacandon jungle (Selva Lacandona)–to visit, document and learn of the plans of the government to possibly relocate them from their homes. What we uncovered was another battle in the ongoing war between a simpler or good way of life (buen vivir) vs. the neoliberal development model.
The following photographs were taken in or near the community of Amador Hernandez; during an over flight of the Selva Lacandona and surrounding African palm plantations; and in the “Sustainable Rural City” Santiago el Pinar.
When the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) went into effect on 1 January 1994, the Indigenous Peoples of Chiapas staged an uprising. The EZLN (Zapatista Army of National Liberation) denounced NAFTA as a “death sentence” for the Indigenous Peoples of Mexico.
Amador Hernandez, deep in rebel territory, was a hotbed of resistance to the Mexican military’s attempt to crush the Zapatistas.
In the Mexican daily, La Jornada, journalist Hermann Bellinghausen wrote in 1999, “A detachment of 500 Mexican Army troops, made up of elite troops and Military Police, are keeping the access blocked leading to the road that joins Amador Hernandez with San Quintin, where the chiapaneco government and the soldiers are trying – at all costs – to build a highway.
“Hundreds of tzeltal indigenous from the region have been holding… a protest sit-in at the entrance to the community, which is also the entrance to the vast and splendid Amador Valley, at the foot of the San Felipe Sierra, in the Montes Azules.”
The people of Amador Hernandez did not let the army go through with their road plan and the army broke its encampment.
The uprising continues today and has been an inspiration to millions of people throughout the world.
Communiqué from Amador Hernandez, Chiapas:
“We, the residents of the Amador Hernandez region in Chiapas, which forms the core of the Montes Azules Biosphere Reserve, well known for its extraordinary biological richness, and the site of historic resistance by indigenous peoples, denounce that the illegal threats by the bad government to expel us, culturally and physically, from our territories, have moved from words to deeds.
Our opposition to the theft of our territory, as decreed in May 2007; our rejection of the unilateral delimiting of the agrarian border of the Lacandona Community demanded by investors in projects associated with the REDD+ [Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation] Project; our refusal to accept the conservationist programs of “payment for environmental services” and “productive land reconversion,” and our decision to reinitiate a process of self-determined community health based in our traditional medicine, together have aroused the arrogance of the bad government, motivating them to advance a “new” counterinsurgency strategy to undermine our resistance.
It is a strategy that doles out sickness and death, dose by dose.”
Amador Hernandez is a barrier to the Chiapas-California deal. People ‘are in the way’ and it appears for the deal to go through, they need to be relocated. The community of Amador Hernandez is refusing.
Many residents of Amador Hernandez feel that in addition to REDD, another reason for potentially relocating them from their village is because the Lacandon jungle is rich in biodiversity which the transnational pharmaceutical companies want to exploit.
After leaving Amador Hernandez, we flew over the Lacandon jungle and see the dense forest and some Mayan ruins, but when we left the jungle, we were confronted by many African oil palm plantations that the government says are going to be used for agrofuels (biofuels).
The following week, Jeff Conant and I visited of Santiago el Pinar. The government of Chiapas has begun developing “Sustainable Rural Cities” like Santiago el Pinar– as places where scattered rural populations can be relocated. The government claims this enables these populations to have services such as electricity and roads, that they could not have in the rural areas. We were told by activists, however, that these “Sustainable Rural Cities” are designed to enable the relocation of communities that are based where development projects–such as large-scale hydroelectric dams, agrofuel plantations, mines, etc–are planned.
On every house or structure in Sanitago el Pinar, “Son Hechos – No Palabras” is emblazoned. Roughly meaning that the government is taking action not just talking about it.
We were told the hothouses were built with food security in mind, but instead we found roses being grown.
The Government overseer of Santiago el Pinar told us that the day before we arrived, Chiapas Governor Sabines had been there for the official dedication. He informed Sabines that a few days earlier his children has been playing inside his pre-fabricated home and they fell through the floor.
Thanks for the shout out!
Greetings! I’ve been reading your weblog for some time now and finally got
the courage to go ahead and give you a shout out from
Dallas Tx! Just wanted to mention keep up the great work!
Pingback: BREAKING: Chiapas cancels ‘disastrous’ forest carbon offset plan linked with Calif. cap-and-trade | Climate Connections
Pingback: “We reject REDD+ in all its versions” – Letter from Chiapas, Mexico opposing REDD in California’s Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) | Climate Connections
Pingback: "We reject REDD+ in all its versions" - Letter from Chiapas, Mexico opposing REDD in California's Global Warming Solutions Act (AB 32) | redd-monitor.org
Pingback: From the Belly of the Beast – A MUST READ on REDD – | REDD is Supported by Greenpeace, Conservation International, Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, WWF & Many More Corporate Greens | NGOWatch | the NGOs & conservation gr
Pingback: From the Belly of the Beast – A MUST READ on REDD – | REDD is Supported by Greenpeace, Conservation International, Nature Conservancy, Environmental Defense Fund, WWF & Many More Corporate Greens | NGOWatch | the NGOs & conservation gr
Pingback: Blog Post from the Belly of the Beast: In the Bowels of the World Bank | Mobilization for Climate Justice
Pingback: Blog Post from the Belly of the Beast: In the Bowels of the World Bank | Climate Connections
Pingback: Theater in the Adirondacks: Conference of the Birds…and a Champagne Cruise! | Climate Connections
Pingback: Theater in the Adirondacks: Conference of the Birds…and a Champagne Cruise! | bluemountaincenter
Pingback: From Co-Director/Strategist Orin Langelle at the Blue Mountain Center Artist’s Residency | Climate Connections
Pingback: Big Night at ILT | bluemountaincenter
Pingback: REDD in the news: 11-17 April 2011 | redd-monitor.org
Pingback: Chiapas: REDD Alert–Urgent Action Neede « Spring Break the System
This kind of sustinability is an enormous lye, an ecological paintes fraus, only to benefit trasnsational bussiness an rich peorple in Mexico and abroad. Of course it halps no to solve nor tehe climatic change nor poverty or teh lack of quality of living tehero or anywhere.
Thank you for reading and supporting!
Thank you so much for your thoughtful comments.
This is an excellent example of why environmentalists should never buy into carbon trading as a solution to global climate change – instead we must require corporations to do the hard work of investing in energy efficiency to curb their own emissions, instead of allowing carbon traders to profit by taking credit for others sustainable ways of living, while deposing those who have the least from the little that is left to them.
Rather than wasting our time on harmful carbon trading legislation as CA has done, lets just protect the Clean Air Act regulations we’ve still got (for the moment) and start prosecuting the polluters from the biggest on down to get them to clean up their acts. Just a few successful prosecutions, and corps and people would start to change for the better out of their own self-interests.
Thank you for your support!
thank you for sharing, chiapas is so close to my heart. its really great you can voice what you’re voicing! now to do something about it! Much love and solidarty from New Zealand.