Category Archives: Climate Justice

For The Earth – David Orton (1934-2011)

Even though this is  a month old, we just found out about David Orton’s passing.  GJEP’s Anne Petermann and Orin Langelle knew David when they co-founded the Native Forest Network’s Eastern North American Resource Center in 1993.  At one time David was NFN’s contact for eastern Canada.

David Orton, !presente!

 –The GJEP Team

David’s death occurred on the morning of Thursday, May 12th, 2011 at his home in Watervale, Pictou County. David was born in Portsmouth, England on January 6th, 1934. He lived in Canada since 1957. David was an activist and deep green philosopher, who dedicated his life to developing the theory of Left Biocentrism within the Deep Ecology movement. He was uncompromising in his fight for the Earth and set a high standard for others to follow. David believed in living simply, where the richness of human life was defined not in material values, but within a deeper spiritual relationship with the Earth.

An account of the burial, “A deep green burial”, which took place on May 15th, can be read at http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/A_deep_green_burial.pd

 His body of work can be found on the Green Web at http://home.ca.inter.net/~greenweb/index.htm

His blog posts are at http://deepgreenweb.blogspot.com/

Comments Off on For The Earth – David Orton (1934-2011)

Filed under Climate Justice

ETC Group on Geoengineering Developments and How to Take Action

There are three important new developments on geoengineering (large-scale intentional manipulation of the Earth systems in an attempt to affect the climate) that we we like to bring to your attention.  What has long been lurking in the shadows of climate negotiations as a wealthy country Plan B has all of a sudden come front and center.  We urge you to pay attention to these developments and intervene where you can.
1.  Christiana Figueres, the Executive Secretary of the UNFCCC gave an interview to The Guardian in the UK on the weekend, stating that “We are putting ourselves in a scenario where we will have to develop more powerful technologies to capture emissions out of the atmosphere”.   Capturing carbon from the atmosphere is geoengineering.  This takes place at a time when Canada and New Zealand are seeking to start a work programme for agriculture in the UNFCCC, looking at modalities for enhancing the amount of carbon that can be stored in soil through techniques like biochar.
Technologies which capture CO2 from the atmosphere through chemical processes (known as direct air capture) are untested and unproven and recently received a particularly negative assessment from the American Physical Society.   The APS found that the prototype direct air capture technology they assessed was not even economically viable before considering the enormous unresolved issues related to the eventual sequestration of carbon in deep geological formations. .  Other geoengineering methods for CO2 removal include ocean fertilization and liming the oceans, both with potentially devastating consequences on marine ecosystems.   See for example this review on ocean fertilization (which has been under a moratorium since 2008 but which is rearing its head again as a group of universities are intent are re-starting experimentation.
2. The three IPCC working groups will be holding a joint meeting on geoengineering in Lima, 20-22 June in preparation for the Fifth Assessment report.  The terms of reference for the meeting are here.   The organizing committee of the meeting includes prominent proponents of geoengineering such as American scientist Ken Caldeira, and Canadians David Keith (University of Calgary) and Jason Blackstock (CIGI) and the topics up for discussion include governance and social, economic and legal aspects of the question.   Keith and Caldeira were instrumental in the Royal Society report on goengineering and both testified before Congress and the UK House of Commons in favour of more research.  They both have patents pending, as you can see from the ETC Group report Geopiracy and are involved in a wide variety of initiatives on geoengineering.
They co-manage Bill Gate’s private geoengineering fund of $4.6 million.   Jason Blackstock was recently described in the Canadian Walrus Magazine as “a young scholar with an almost luminous sense of self-confidence”.  He was the main author of the peculiar Novim report on stratospheric aerosols and has been involved in getting prestigous mainstream foreign policy outfits involved in geoengineering in the UK, Canada and US .   Blackstock is also slated to speak on a panel about geoengineering organized by the Canadian embassy (!) in Sao Paulo Brazil, 16 June 2011.
3.  The Convention on Biological Diversity is also busy reviewing papers and convening meetings ito follow up on the de facto moratorium on geoengineering activities adopted at COP 10 in Nagoya, Japan in October 2010.  The first consultative meeting on geoengineering organized by the CBD will take place June 10 in Bonn, on the margins of the climate negotiations.   This mini-workshop will examine the question of how to define geoengineering, its impacts on biodiversity and questions about its governance — an ambitious agenda.  To its credit, the CBD meeting is not invitation only (like so many others: the SRMGI consultation recently held in the UK, the International Risk Governance Council, the Asilomar Conference on Climate Intervention ) and civil society organizations and governments are equally able to attend.
Furthermore, the CBD is mandated not to do a simple technical review of the proposals but to examine their risks for the environment and biodiversity and associated social, economic and cultural impacts.   The CBD has also created a “liaison group” to oversee its work on geoengineering that will hopefully provide some balance to the discussions thus far that have been dominated by a small group of scientific experts engaged in research, with notoriously low participation from developing countries, social scientists, women, Indigenous Peoples and local communities, as well as other critical voices from civil society.
On the one hand, it is a positive development that different UN bodies are beginning to discuss geoengineering because any modification of our oceans  and atmosphere will ultimately affect all countries. All countries must therefore be involved in discussions about it.   However, there will also be tremendous pressure exerted by powerful countries who are counting on using this Plan B to move forward with research, public funding programmes and real-world experimentation with inevitable transboundary impacts. The global South and civil society must be clear that geoengineering is not an alternative to the existing and agreed upon priorities of mitigation and adaptation, according to the principle of common but differentiated responsibilities. Any new multilateral governance arrangement must strengthen the existing moratorium, not weaken it.  That means a strict prohibition of all unilateral experimentation of geoengineering technologies  —  at least until there is a multilateral consensus that this avenue could or should be explored.  So far, international consensus says we do not want to go down this road.  Let’s keep it that way. 
If you have not yet done so, you can join the international campaign against geoengineering experiments atwww.handsoffmotherearth.org

A joint civil society letter is in the works regarding the IPCC meeting. If you are interested to see the letter and sign on behalf of your organization, please contact Veronica Villa: veronica@etcgroup.org

From: Diana Bronson, ETC Group

Comments Off on ETC Group on Geoengineering Developments and How to Take Action

Filed under Climate Change, Climate Justice, Corporate Globalization, False Solutions to Climate Change, UNFCCC

Statement on Need to Protect Forests from Plurinational State of Bolivia

Note: GJEP agrees that protecting forests–and we mean REALLY protecting biodiverse, culturally important, native forests–is critical to solving the problem of climate change, and that industrialized countries must make a clear, legally-binding commitment to substantially reduce their carbon emissions immediately.  However, the Kyoto Protocol never did this.  It was a legally binding agreement ignored by the US (the largest emitter in the world) that did not go nearly far enough in its call for carbon reductions.  It’s goal of 5.2% reductions below 1990 levels was completely inadequate to address the problem.  And as we have seen since Kyoto went into effect in 2005, emissions have continued to rise.  Could the new round of Kyoto mandate legally binding and effective emissions reductions?  What is absolutely clear is that any non-binding or voluntary agreement (as is being pushed by the US and other Industrialized countries) will not even be worth the paper on which it is written.  And if it is binding, how can the government of the US be trusted?  We all know what a screwed-up track record they have (and not just on the climate issue).  It is for this reason that GJEP works with social movements, organizations, communities and Indigenous Peoples’ Organizations around the world to identify and promote those thousands of locally-controlled, small-scale solutions to climate change that already exist.

–The GJEP Team

CLIMATE NEGOTIATIONS NEED:

KYOTO, A FOCUS ON PROTECTING FORESTS NOW

BONN- Today, as UN climate negotiations continued their slow start, Ambassador Pablo Solon of the Plurinational State of Bolivia outlined a clear vision to move negotiations forward.Ambassador Solon in a press conference addressed :

  • Possible outcomes from the annual climate conference, to be held in Durban, South Africa in December;
  • the importance of forest protection to negotiations;
  • the need to recognize the rights of Mother Earth; and
  • proposed an international financial transaction tax.

Durban Outcomes

“In Durban we cannot repeat the mistakes of Cancun. In Durban we need a second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol, that is the only possible concrete outcome. There is no time for a new legally binding treaty. The choice is binding targets in the Kyoto Protocol or a non-binding decision that does not resolve the issue of reducing emissions in developed countries.” Ambassador Solon said.

“We cannot come out of South Africa with the targets we have now, the UNEP has shown they will lead us to 4C of global warming. We must have targets that limit temperature rise to between 1C and 1.5C to preserve life as we know it.” Ambassador Solon said.

Forests at Bonn Negotiations

 “We also need a clear position in relation to the issue of forests. Forests are integral to the lives of millions and an essential part of the world’s natural system. We cannot spend the money that we have now, a very small amount of money, trying to measure the amount of carbon that forests store in order to prepare the conditions for a future carbon market in the forest.” Ambassador Solon said.

“What we need to do is direct that small amount of resources that we have to preserve forests now. The key issue is to develop and implement key actions now, and not in 8 years when there might be a carbon market, but right now in order to preserve the forests today so that they can continue living and giving life.” Ambassador Solon said.

Rights of Mother Earth

“When we consider climate change we are not just talking about floods, rains, and droughts but more holistically but the Earth’s systems as a whole. It’s not just about the number of emissions but how we are affecting the whole system – of individuals eco-systems and the system of planet Earth.” Ambassador Solon said.

“We must recognize that we are a part of a system and we cannot commodity and transform this system without consequences. All countries, in all their policies, must respect the natural boundaries of the Earth’s systems. The rights of the other parts of this system must be considered and we need to develop international rules and laws to preserve the integrity of the Earth’s system. Bolivia has made submissions to develop these rules at the climate negotiations.” Ambassador Solon said.

 International Financial Transaction Tax

 “Developing countries are very disappointed and concerned about the status of the proposed fast start climate finance ($30B) from Copenhagen. There hasn’t been an official review and it needs a concrete and official report.” Ambassador Solon said.

“Civil society analysis shows that most ‘fast start finance’ is not new. It’s just recycling of official aid that was already agreed for projects that were already being financed. Before they were under agriculture or infrastructure but now they are called climate finance. But real, actually new funds, the famous $30B promised in Copenhagen, has not come to developing countries.” Ambassador Solon said.

“Instead of waiting for this promise of fast start finance to materialize we have put forward a proposal for a tax on International Financial Transactions. This would be a mechanism that can generate real funds and we will have the funds to act immediately to address the protection of forests and fight climate change.” Ambassador Solon said.

“The tax would be voluntary, each country could decide to be involved, but the revenue raised would go into a common fund to fight climate change. It could be scaled up quickly and is a decisive response – experience shows we cannot rely on private finance to generate nearly enough to take effective action.” Ambassador Solon said.

Press Conference Tomorrow, June 8 by the Plurinational State of Bolivia:

Forests, Rights of Nature and Current Situation of the Climate Change Negotiations

UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, Bonn Germany

Place: Room Haydn, Hotel Maritim, Bonn, Germany

Date and Time: Wednesday, June 8, 11am

Comments Off on Statement on Need to Protect Forests from Plurinational State of Bolivia

Filed under Climate Change, Climate Justice, False Solutions to Climate Change, UNFCCC

New Trial Begins Against Copenhagen Climate Activists

Note: Stine and Tannie are good friends of Global Justice Ecology Project.  We got to know them through the year and a half of organizing meetings under the “Climate Justice Action” umbrella in preparation for “Reclaim Power” action at the UN Climate Conference in Copenhagen in December 2009.  We deplore the fact that they are being scapegoated and charged under Danish anti-terrorism laws.  Stine and Tannie are participants in our New Voices on Climate Change Program. We stand in solidarity with Stine and Tannie and echo the demand that all of their charges be dropped.  We will post updates and action alerts as we receive them.

–The GJEP Team

From the Climate Collective

With the beginning of the new trial, Climate Collective expresses once again its solidarity and support to the climate activists Stine and
Tannie that are facing charges in relation to the ‘Reclaim Power! Pushing for Climate Justice’ action that took place during the protests
against COP15 in 2009. Stine and Tannie acted as spokespersons for the Climate Justice Action (CJA) network, communicating and explaining the Reclaim Power! action to the media. Reclaim Power was built and planned on consensus in open, international meetings that took place before and during COP15 in Copenhagen. Climate Collective finds it outrageous that two activists are made responsible for the actions of an entire movement.

After being sentenced to four months on probation, yesterday the appeal case started at the second court level. Climate Collective support Stine
and Tannie’s position and demand once again for all charges to be dropped. The trial will continue until mid next week and it is not yet
clear when a final verdict will be announced.

Updates on the court case will be posted on climatecollective.org in the coming days.

More info on the previous court case can be found at these links:
http://www.climatecollective.org/post/118
http://www.climatecollective.org/post/151

In solidarity,
Climate Collective

Comments Off on New Trial Begins Against Copenhagen Climate Activists

Filed under Actions / Protest, Climate Justice, Copenhagen/COP-15

Our Weekly Earth Segment on KPFK Pacifica Los Angeles

Global Justice Ecology Project partners with the Sojourner Truth show each week to produce an Earth Segment, which airs on Thursday.

Listen to this week’s interview with Brent Newell, attorney for the Center for Race Poverty and the Environment about their lawsuit against the cap and trade provisions of California’s climate bill AB32.  The interview immediately follows the opening news headlines at minute 6:20.

Click here to go to the Sojourner Truth show

Comments Off on Our Weekly Earth Segment on KPFK Pacifica Los Angeles

Filed under Carbon Trading, Climate Change, Climate Justice

GJEP Co-directors to Speak at Johnson State College April 26th

Orin Langelle and Anne Petermann, Co-Directors of Global Justice Ecology Project will speak about the work of GJEP at Johnson State College in Johnson, Vermont Tuesday, April 26th at 4pm at the Stearns Performance Space at the Student Center.

Orin will show slides from his recent trip to the village of Amador Hernandez in the Lacandon Jungle of Chiapas, Mexico.  He will discuss the resistance of Indigenous communities there to false solutions to climate change such as REDD (Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation).

Elders in the Village of Amador Hernandez in Chiapas, Mexico. Photo: Langelle/GJEP-GFC

Anne will additionally speak about the organization’s work with the climate justice movement internationally.

Comments Off on GJEP Co-directors to Speak at Johnson State College April 26th

Filed under Climate Change, Climate Justice, Indigenous Peoples, REDD

Education in action

Aziz Choudry is on the board of Global Justice Ecology Project.  The cover photograph was taken by GJEP’s Co-director/Stategist Orin Langelle.

–The GJEP Team

_____________________

Cross-posted from Rabble

By Stefan Christoff

Learning from the Ground Up works to challenge traditional understandings of knowledge production

by Aziz Choudry and Dip Kapoor, eds.
(Palgrave Macmillan, 2010; $98.00)

Translating the profound ways that grassroots activism, protest movements on the streets, both contribute and influence the development of political thought in societies globally is a complex task.

Collecting voices from social movements internationally Learning from the Ground Up, a collection edited by Aziz Choudry and Dip Kapoor, works to challenge traditional understandings of knowledge production, placing value and focus not on the often elite halls of academia but on the informal universities of the streets.

Co-convenor of the collection Choudry offers analysis on the complex and often unbalanced power relations between NGOs and social movements to open the book. Choudry explores a common political failure of major NGOs to engage with social movements fighting for transformative social change, backing away from rooted campaigns that challenge the colonial trajectory of contemporary capitalism, settling instead on calls for limited political reforms that can reinforce neoliberal economic systems, offering little reprieve in a global context of environmental crisis and economic collapse.

“Today, it continues to be the case that acknowledgement and a commitment to confront colonialism and use a lens that sees neoliberal globalization as another wave of colonization are still more likely to be articulated by Indigenous Peoples, landless, small, or peasant farmers’ movements, or communities of colour directly confronting corporate and state power themselves and allies in smaller activist groups and networks than in larger NGOs,” writes Choudry, in an opening chapter clearly shaped by work as a long-time social justice activist.

Articulating a diversity of international experiences, Learning from the Ground Up presents writings from engaged thinkers directly implicated in grassroots campaigns, sharing ideas on the underestimated ability for political theory emerging via activism to shape our world. Beyond broad political reflection this collection is a reflective text rooted in some profound activist experiences.

From Colombia Mario Novelli presents a chapter reflecting on the major union strike orchestrated by militant trade unions that halted government efforts to privatize EMCALI, the public provider of water, electricity and telecommunications in Cali, Colombia’s second largest city.

Beyond detailing major protests and direct actions facilitated by public sector union activists, including a dramatic 36 day occupation of CAM tower in Cali, the headquarters of EMCALI in 2001. Novelli details a process of social engagement rooted in community town halls and workshops, that built bridges between union organizers, union membership and general community members, social sectors that government forces worked intensely to divide in the push toward privitization.

In outlining the battle to retain public control over the public sector in Colombia, Novelli offers insights on a brilliant strategy of social mobilization, lead-by SINTRAEMCALI, created organically in struggle, rooted in both direct action and popular education, a critical read for communities globally facing state-driven efforts to privatize public works.

On Pakistan Azra Talat Sayeed and Wali Haider present an amazing chapter examining the mobilization of Anjuman-e-Mazareen Punjab (AMP – Punjab Tenants Association) against historic servitude of farming communities and in opposition to recent militarized efforts to push peasants off traditional lands.

From Pakistan the book tells an incredible tale of community-based campaigning lead-by people directly affected under the slogan “ownership or death,” a campaign that resulted in massive protest marches, women-lead confrontations with state military forces and international attention toward a campaign involving nearly “a hundred thousand tenant farmers in more than twenty districts of Punjab,” a key campaign farmers struggles in South Asia in the past decade.

From the chapter written by David Austin on the importance of deeper left reflection on the Grenada revolution in the Caribbean and the following U.S.-backed coup in 1983, to the words of Canadian Union of Postal Workers activist Dave Bleakney on education based organizing within Canada’s national postal workers union, this book is an critical read for those directly engaging with struggles for social change in Canada and internationally.

Via narratives on grassroots knowledge production from around the world Learning from the Ground Up attempts in a unique way to share the ideas that fuel grassroots action. In actively exploring the major role that social movements play shaping contemporary political theory, this publication is also wake-up call for many in academia working to develop theories on social change far away from the front-lines of grassroots struggle.—Stefan Christoff

Stefan Christoff is a Montreal-based community activist, artist and journalist who contributes to rabble.ca. Stefan is @Spirodon.

 

Comments Off on Education in action

Filed under Climate Justice

Interview with Arnoldo García on KPFK Radio’s Sojourner Truth Show

Listen to this week’s interview with Arnoldo Garcia as he discusses the environmental and social justice issues associated with immigration, U.S. border control and the dangers that migrants face in attempting to cross a heavily policed, border war zone. Garcia also ties in the effects that border control issues have on the natural environment: to flora, fauna and water supplies.

Click here and jump to minute 27:37

 

Arnoldo García is Program Director of the Immigrant Justice & Rights Program at the National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights and heads up HURRICANE: The Human Rights Immigrant Community Action Network. Arnoldo edits Network News, NNIRR’s newsmagazine, and represents NNIRR on the regional coordinators committee of the “Liberty & Justice for All Campaign” with the Washington, D.C.-based Rights Working Group.

In 2006 Arnoldo launched a national community dialogue on ending militarization and State violence in border control and immigration enforcement.  In 2007, Arnoldo was presented with the “Cesar E. Chavez Leadership Achievement Award,” recognizing his lifelong commitment to community organizing and defense of rights. His essay on the significance of the massive 2006 immigrant community mobilizations, “Immigrant Rights and Power: Transforming Social Justice, Dreaming A Different World,” was published by the Southern California Library for Social Research journal. In 2003, he edited the organizational report Human Rights & Human Security at Risk: The Consequences of Placing Immigration Enforcement and Services in the Department of Homeland Security and in 2008 he edited Over-Raided, Under-Siege: U.S. Immigration Laws and Enforcement Destroy the Rights of Immigrants.

Arnoldo is also a long-time cultural worker and musician; his work appears in XicKorea – poems rants words together (California, 2003), Chokecherries (New Mexico, 2005) and Hurricane Katrina: Response and Responsibilities (New Pacific Press, 2005).

Comments Off on Interview with Arnoldo García on KPFK Radio’s Sojourner Truth Show

Filed under Climate Justice