Yearly Archives: 2010

“Invisible” nature key to global economy-U.N.

What is described in the article below is exactly the opposite direction of what is needed to restore ecological sanity to Planet Earth.  The role of business and economies has been and will always be transforming “resources” (i.e. nature and people) into profits. Next week the UN Convention on Biological Diversity launches its 10th Conference of the Parties in Nagoya, Japan where the role of business in “conserving” biodiversity will be a central theme.  I will be in reporting on this blog on the outcomes of this meeting throughout the week.

There are two major outcomes being sought at the CBD’s COP-10:  1) the advancement of BBOP, the Business and Biodiversity Offsets Program, which seeks to allow corporations to continue to destroy biodiversity as long as they “offset it” by protecting some elsewhere; and 2) a “Green Development Mechanism” modeled after the disastrous Clean Development Mechanism of the UN Climate Conference.  This GDM will provide cover for the ongoing destruction of biodiversity under the auspices of “protecting” it. Tune in next week for all the action.

–Anne Petermann, Global Justice Ecology Project

By David Fogarty, Climate Change Correspondent, Asia

SINGAPORE, Oct 12 (Reuters) – Nature is not just about fluffy animals or brightly coloured frogs — it’s central to the health of businesses that need to incorporate environmental impacts into their risk management, a senior United Nations official said.

Such an approach should be obvious, said Richard Burrett, co-chair of the United Nations Environment Programme’s Finance Initiative, yet nature remains essentially invisible to many people and companies, particularly in urban centres.

“All financial and economic capital, is derived from natural capital,” Burrett told Reuters ahead of a major U.N. conference from Oct. 18 in Japan that aims to set new targets to combat accelerating loss of plant and animal species. [ID:nSGE68T06H]

“We act as if we have endless abundance of natural capital to underpin our global economic activity, yet it’s clear that we’re degrading it at a phenomenally fast rate,” said Burrett, a former global head of project finance for ABN AMRO and now a partner at investment advisory firm Earth Capital Partners.

Impacts on nature needed to be measured and managed right through the supply chain, he said.

But accounting systems needed to be refocused to fully calculate environmental degradation caused by economic development. Failure to do so meant companies were not measuring the balance sheet and profit and loss accurately, he added.

“I think the companies that really understand their ecological footprint and can manage it in all aspects of their business will be better positioned,” he said, adding this was not just about reputational risk but future regulatory risk.

The UNEP Finance Initiative draws in nearly 200 financial institutions such as banks, asset managers, pension funds and insurers to promote environmentally friendly investment principles to help the finance sector change the way it works.

“Rewiring our system is the key thing and it’s trying to make sure we genuinely understand the risk agenda,” Burrett said.

SYSTEMIC RISK

The past three years had shown how little the financial sector understood systemic risk. The global financial crisis had shown that the sector had failed to grasp the risks it was creating, he said.

The United Nations and green groups say a price needs to be placed on all the services that nature provides, from clean air and water from forests, fish from coral reefs and oceans, pollination of crops by bees to healthy soils to grow food.

About a billion people rely on coral reefs and mangroves, which are vital fish nurseries that replenish fish stocks, a major source of protein.

Yet many of these ecosystems are in decline because of pollution, deforestation and expansion of agriculture, over-hunting and the impacts of climate change.

The world body says it is critical to put the brakes on the loss of plants and animals since the richness of species is central to the health of ecosystems.

Burrett said the devastation wrought by the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico and Australia’s decision to slash water extraction from the Murray-Darling river system highlighted the central role nature played and how impacts on ecosystems needed to be managed.

The Australian government said last week farmers in the prime agricultural Murray-Darling river basin would lose more than a third of irrigated water to try to restore ailing rivers and survive future droughts caused by climate-change.
Burrett said banks, asset managers, pension funds and insurers were already starting to change their investment practices with new environmental and social standards guiding money for project finance.

But he said it was industries that had the greatest impact, such as miners, logging firms, food and pharmaceutical companies.

Some were managing their environmental risks, such as insisting on using only sustainable palm oil.

“There are some positive signs but it’s very fledgling.” (Editing by Alex Richardson)

Comments Off on “Invisible” nature key to global economy-U.N.

Filed under Biodiversity, Climate Change

Chaco deforestation by Christian sect puts Paraguayan land under threat

Note: GJEP Co-Director/ Strategist Orin Langelle was invited by the Ayoreo People at Parrot Field in the Gran Chaco of Paraguay to document their community in February 2009.  Orin then sent his photo exhibit, which he calls “Sharing the Eye” to the Ayoreo for an exhibit there.  Orin’s photos from this documentary expedition can be viewed on our website by clicking here.  Photo: Langelle/GJEP-GFC
__________________________________________________________________
Chaco deforestation by Christian sect puts Paraguayan land under threat
By John Vidal
 

Wildlife and the world’s last uncontacted tribe both at risk as Mennonites turn Chaco forest into prairie-style farmland

Deforestation in Paraguay is forcing the people of the Ayoreo tribe to leave land they have occupied for generations.

Click here to view the video from Survival International

Hitler was said to have fled there, the Spanish conquistadores failed to penetrate it, and the only uncontacted tribe outside Amazonia lives within its borders. But now the vast Paraguayan wilderness of thorn trees, jaguars and snakes known as the Chaco is being transformed by a Christian fundamentalist sect and hundreds of Brazilian ranchers.

Worldwide food shortages and rock-bottom land prices in Paraguay have made the Chaco the last agricultural frontier. Great swaths of the virgin thorn forest once dubbed Latin America’s “green hell”, are being turned into prairie-style grasslands to rear meat for Europe and grow biofuel crops for cars.

Recent satellite imagery confirmed that about one million hectares, or nearly 10%, of the virgin, dry forest in northern Paraguay has been cleared in just four years by ranchers using fire, chains and bulldozers to open up land. By comparison, Brazil claims to have nearly halted its deforestation of the Amazon.

Landowners in the Chaco, the second-largest South American forest outside the Amazon, must by law leave trees on 25% of their land but the region’s remoteness and the government’s lack of resources for monitoring or prosecuting law-breakers has encouraged rampant, illegal felling of the dense, slow-growing forest.

The consequence, say conservationists, including David Attenborough, is a growing ecological disaster with widespread erosion and desertification taking place in one of the world’s most fragile and diverse environments.

“This is one of the last great wilderness areas left in the world. It is vital that we save the incredible biodiversity of these habitats,” said Attenborough, who made some of his earliest wildlife films in the region.

The barely populated expanse of almost impenetrable forest, twice the size of the UK, is home to about 3,400 plant species, 500 bird species, 150 species of mammals, 120 species of reptiles, and 100 species of amphibians. Jaguars, pumas, giant anteaters and otters make it one of the most diverse in the world.

In November the Natural History Museum will send 60 scientists to investigate two areas of the forest. They expect to find several hundred new species.

About 20,000 Indians lived in the area for centuries but the land was never colonised by western groups until the 1930s when fundamentalist Mennonite sects from Russia and eastern Europe were given large areas, to allow them to avoid communist persecution.

As in Brazil, the indigenous people were largely wiped out and then deprived of their ancestral land.

The Mennonites, who include the traditional Amish sect of Pennsylvania, believe in a strict interpretation of the bible and often seek isolation in remote areas. But the Chaco land rush, which has seen prices rise from under $10 a hectare to over $200 in a few years, has made the sect worth at least $500m.

The large Mennonite families and powerful co-operative farm groups have bought an estimated 2m hectares of land in the Chaco. What also used to be modest meat and dairy enterprises have grown into formidable agri-businesses dominating Paraguayan livestock farming.

Mennonite communities, where an old German dialect is mostly spoken, now sport new pick-up trucks and have north American-style hypermarkets and restaurants.

“We intend to expand in the Chaco as much as the law allows. Not just physically but by making the land more productive,” said Heinrich Dyck, finance director of the Neuland co-operative of Mennonite farmers based in Filadelfia, the largest Mennonite community, of 4,000 people. The co-operative is one of Paraguay’s largest meat and milk exporters and owns the country’s biggest slaughterhouse.

Dyck added: “Religion is at the heart of everything we do. The Christian faith is fundamental to us. God made it clear in the bible that we should take care of the land and use it as a source of sustainability and production.”.

The Mennonites, who until recently paid no taxes, run their own schools and police. They have been joined in the Chaco by hundreds of Brazilian ranchers. These are mostly the descendants of German émigrés who established themselves in southern Brazil after the war. The Brazilians are now believed by government to own nearly 3m hectares.

“The Brazilians are now exporting deforestation,” said one government spokesman.

The two groups, which both speak German, now control nearly a third of the Paraguayan Chaco and have rapidly developed a $100m-a-year meat and dairy agri-business which exports meat to Chile, Europe, Israel and Russia.

Ignacio Rivas, a conservationist with the Paraguayan group Guyra, said: “The fate of the Chaco lies with these groups. At this rate 75% or more of the Chaco will have disappeared in a generation. Both groups are expanding aggressively. Their style of farming is totally unsuited to the fragile soils of the Chaco and will lead only to desertification and erosion.”

Mennonite and other large landowners this week defended the deforestation, arguing that it created jobs. “The Chaco was for sale a few years ago. No one wanted it. Why did not the conservationists buy it then?” said Massimo Coda, a spokesman for the Rural Association of Paraguay. “The reason why so much land is being cleared now is that we fear that more restrictions will be put on how much forest we can fell. We fear we will be stuck with a forest which pays nothing. We accept there is ecological damage, but we are prepared to leave more land forested.”

A spokesman for the environment ministry said: “We know what is happening in the Chaco but there’s little we can do. This land is very fragile. It will take many years to recover. The most important thing we can do is to try to conserve as much as possible. But we need the help of the international community to stop the losses in the most fragile areas.”

Concern is building over the future of isolated Indian groups. The Ayoreo-Totobiegosode is the only uncontacted tribe in South America outside Amazonia, but earlier this year bulldozers hired from a Mennonite transport company were found illegally destroying thousands of acres of the land they regularly use.

According to Survival International American fundamentalist churches helped organise “manhunts” in which large groups of Totobiegosode were forcibly brought out of the forest as late as the 1986 to be converted to Christianity.

“Everyone knows about the Amazon but this is one of the last unknown places on earth and it is being destroyed for the sake of a few hamburgers before we even study it. This is short-term gain with desertification the only long-term prospect. It will cease to work as an ecosystem if we allow this destruction to carry on,” said John Burton, chief executive of the Word Land Trust.

The Chaco has a history of surviving anything that man can throw at it, including war and a proposal that it become a global nuclear waste dump. During the 16th century, Spanish conquistadores tried to penetrate it but the vegetation, harsh climate, lack of water and indigenous tribes defeated them and the Chaco was largely ignored.

In 1932, following a rumoured oil strike by Shell, Bolivian troops invaded the region but were defeated by a lack of water and searing temperatures. More than 2,000 people died in the three-year war and the outlines of trenches are still clear, with pieces of metal from tanks still littering the countryside.

Explorers hope for new species

Sixty British and Paraguyan scientists are to spend a month in unexplored northern Chaco in a biodiversity expedition expected to discover several hundred new wildlife species.

The Natural History Museum’s expedition will be the largest scientific exercise ever mounted in Paraguay and one of the most ambitious by British scientists in 30 years.

Specialists in several fields, including spiders, birds, microbes, plants, mammals, and fossils, will spend two weeks in two of the remotest northern regions, close to the Bolivian border.

The army-backed expedition of 100 scientists, cooks and logistics experts will have to endure extreme conditions. “Temperatures are expected to reach 48C, humidity will be 100%, floods are possible and mosquitoes, ticks and other biting insects are certain,” said Alberto Yanosky, chief executive of the Paraguayan conservation group Gwyra, which is helping to organise the trip. “We have no idea what we might find. No one has researched these areas.”

The Chaco, which stretches over nearly 240,000 sq km, is similar topographically, and in places climatically, to the Australian outback. Covering parts of Bolivia, Paraguay and Argentina, it is a mix of forest, palm woodland, shrubby steppe, and swamp. It is the second largest biome in South America after Amazonia.

5 Comments

Filed under Climate Change, Climate Justice, Indigenous Peoples, Latin America-Caribbean, Photo Essays by Orin Langelle

Update from Stine and Tannie’s trial

Cross-posted from Climate Collective

Note: Stine Gry Jonassen was accredited by Global Justice Ecology Project to attend the 15th Conference of the UN Climate Convention in Copenhagen, Denmark.  Stine was one of the Danish organizers and spokespeople for the Reclaim Power action that occurred on the 16th of December in Copenhagen.  She spoke about the action the day prior to it during a press conference in the official UN venue.  She is now part of a group being persecuted for their role in organizing this non-violent event during which observers and delegates marched out of the UN climate talks to join a mass march on the outside for what was called “A Peoples’ Assembly.”  GJEP decries this unjust persecution of non-violent activists who were attacked and beaten by the Danish Police.

–GJEP Team

Read Climate Collective’s press release in Danish or in English

Day one has finished

The first day of trial against Tannie and Stine has just ended.

The day started with a small action outside the courthouse, where activists from Climate Collective held a banner stating that “We all shouted PUSH!” and set up an installation with pictures of people that “shouted push” in support to the defendants. (Pictures can be seen here and here).

In the morning, the prosecutor showed video clips from the Reclaim Power action, and Stine was interrogated both by the prosecutor and by her lawyer. While the prosecutor asked about Stine’s involvement and about her understanding of how crowds can be a danger (also trying to compare Reclaim Power with the tragedy happened 9 years ago at Roskilde Festival, where many died squeezed in the crowd during a concert!), many of the defendant’s lawyer’s questions regarded the role of CJA’s spokesperson and whether their statements were their own thought, or were expression of the network’s position. It clearly emerged how spokesperson doesn’t equal organizer, and how both her and Tannie were involved in media work and not in the logistical preparations of the action. Also the dialogue process between CJA and the police was brought in, to show how the action had been clearly communicated, had been authorized by police and had a clear codex of “non violent civil disobedience”.

After the lunch break, the prosecutor asked the same questions to Tannie. Answering to his and then her lawyer’s questions, Tannie explained (yet again!) what the role of the spokespersons was, or the fact that the communal sleeping spaces were not exclusive CJA spaces.

Throughout the day, other clips and newspaper articles were shown or read, explaining the formation of CJA, the concept of climate justice and the development of Reclaim Power from the CJA March meeting onwards. Also, one of the defence witnesses was considered not pertinent, and will therefore not be called in to testify.

The day ended with the prosecutor showing several other video footage from the day, that didn’t show much but police violence and a peaceful crowd, being beaten, pepper sprayed and still not breaking the action codex.

It seems already clear from now that the next two days (October 27th and 28th scheduled for the trial will not be enough, and the two additional dates could be December 8th and 15th. This will be confirmed later on.

Join the campaign “I also shouted PUSH!”

Comments Off on Update from Stine and Tannie’s trial

Filed under Actions / Protest, Climate Justice, Copenhagen/COP-15, Independent Media

GE Trees and Biochar Will Save the Planet! (Not really…)

In the article below, we once again find scientists attempting to advance their careers by suggesting that the best way to “save the planet” is by getting as far away from nature as possible.  In this fantastical article, scientists argue that industrial scale plantations of GE trees could store enough carbon to help stop climate change.  This ignores several studies that have come before it.  One by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the World Resources Institute found that tree plantations only store 1/4 the carbon of native wild forests.  Another from Duke University found that trees do not increase their uptake of carbon unless their soils are rich in nitrogen.  This either means rich agricultural lands will need to be taken over for these plantations (displacing communities and exacerbating the food crisis) or they will need nitrogen fertilizers–which are a major source of greenhouse gas emissions.

The idea behind this study comes out of the World Forestry Congress–that global gathering of timber industry executives, foresters and others that occurs once every six years.  At their last gathering in Buenos Aires in 2009 they extolled the notion that we can have our trees and eat them too.  We can store more carbon in trees at the same time that we massively increase the demand for wood for bioenergy, biochar and other products.

This logic is obviously flawed on multiple levels and ignores the most basic rule of genetic engineering–unforseen consequences are unavoidable.  Engineering DNA causes mutations which lead to unpredictable results.  The only thing certain about genetic engineering is that it is an absolutely uncertain and highly dangerous science.

–Anne Petermann, for the GJEP Team

(to read Anne’s blog post from the World Forestry Congress, click here

To read the outcomes of the World Forestry Congress, click here

___________________________________________________________

Genetically altered trees, plants could help counter global warming

Cross-posted from American Institute of Biological Sciences

Study evaluates prospects for boosting carbon sequestration from the atmosphere by modifying natural biological processes and deploying novel food and fuel crops


Forests of genetically altered trees and other plants could sequester several billion tons of carbon from the atmosphere each year and so help ameliorate global warming, according to estimates published in the October issue of BioScience.

The study, by researchers at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and Oak Ridge National Laboratory, outlines a variety of strategies for augmenting the processes that plants use to sequester carbon dioxide from the air and convert it into long-lived forms of carbon, first in vegetation and ultimately in soil.

Besides increasing the efficiency of plants’ absorption of light, researchers might be able to genetically alter plants so they send more carbon into their roots–where some may be converted into soil carbon and remain out of circulation for centuries. Other possibilities include altering plants so that they can better withstand the stresses of growing on marginal land, and so that they yield improved bioenergy and food crops. Such innovations might, in combination, boost substantially the amount of carbon that vegetation naturally extracts from air, according to the authors’ estimates.

The researchers stress that the use of genetically engineered plants for carbon sequestration is only one of many policy initiatives and technical tools that might boost the carbon sequestration already occurring in natural vegetation and crops.

The article, by Christer Jansson, Stan D. Wullschleger, Udaya C. Kalluri, and Gerald A. Tuskan, is the first in a Special Section in the October BioScience that includes several perspectives on the prospects for enhancing biological carbon sequestration. Other articles in the section analyze the substantial ecological and economic constraints that limit such efforts. One article discusses the prospects for sequestering carbon by culturing algae to produce biofuel feedstocks; one proposes a modification of the current regulatory climate for producing genetically engineered trees in the United States; and one discusses societal perceptions of the issues surrounding the use of genetically altered organisms to ameliorate warming attributed to the buildup of greenhouse gases.

_________________________________________________

By noon EST on 1 October 2010 and until early November, the full text of the article will be available for free download through the copy of this press release available at www.aibs.org/bioscience-press-releases/.

BioScience, published 11 times per year, is the journal of the American Institute of Biological Sciences (AIBS). BioScience publishes commentary and peer-reviewed articles covering a wide range of biological fields, with a focus on “Organisms from Molecules to the Environment.” The journal has been published since 1964. AIBS is an umbrella organization for professional scientific societies and organizations that are involved with biology. It represents some 200 member societies and organizations with a combined membership of about 250,000.
The complete list of peer-reviewed articles in the October 2010 issue of BioScience is as follows:
Phytosequestration: Carbon Biosequestration by Plants and the Prospects of Genetic Engineering by Christer Jansson, Stan D. Wullschleger, Udaya C. Kalluri, and Gerald A. Tuskan
Opportunities and Constraints for Forest Climate Mitigation by Robert B. Jackson and Justin S. Baker
Managing Soils and Ecosystems for Mitigating Anthropogenic Carbon Emissions and Advancing Global Food Security by Rattan Lal
Microalgae: The Potential for Carbon Capture by Richard Sayre
Far-reaching Deleterious Impacts of Regulations on Research and Environmental Studies of Recombinant DNA-modified Perennial Biofuel Crops in the United States by Steven H. Strauss, Drew L. Kershen, Joe H. Bouton, Thomas P. Redick, Huimin Tan, and Roger A. Sedjo
Societal Choice for Climate Change Futures: Trees, Biotechnology, and Clean Development by Emily Boyd
Time Horizons and Extinction Risk in Endangered Species Categorization Systems by Jesse D’Elia and Scott McCarthy

Comments Off on GE Trees and Biochar Will Save the Planet! (Not really…)

Filed under GE Trees

Listen to today’s Podcast with Orin Langelle on KPFK

Today’s podcast features Global Justice Ecology Project’s Co-Director/Strategist Orin Langelle speak about his experience and thoughts regarding last Thursday’s (September 23)  meeting in Manhattan with Evo Morales Ayma, the Indigenous President of the Plurinational State of Bolivia and Pablo Salón, Bolivia’s Ambassador to the UN to discuss the preparations for the upcoming UN Climate Conference in Cancún.

Click here to listen to the Podcast

Comments Off on Listen to today’s Podcast with Orin Langelle on KPFK

Filed under Climate Change, Climate Justice, Earth Minute

An Evening with Evo

By Anne Petermann, Executive Director, Global Justice Ecology Project

On Thursday, September 23rd, Global Justice Ecology Project co-Director/ Strategist Orin Langelle and I traveled to Manhattan for a meeting with Evo Morales Ayma, the Indigenous President of the Plurinational State of Bolivia and Pablo Salón, Bolivia’s Ambassador to the UN to discuss the preparations for the upcoming UN Climate Conference in Cancún. Invited to the event were a small number of people representing NGOs, Indigenous Peoples’ Organizations and social movements including Indigenous Environmental Network, La Via Campesina, Grassroots International, the National Family Farm Coalition, and Institute for Policy Studies, among others.

After gathering at the Bolivian Mission on 2nd Avenue, our group of 30 or so negotiated the maze of police barricades and uniformed officers to arrive at the Church Center for the United Nations, directly across the street from the massive UN building.

We waited for an hour or so in the “Boss Room” of the Church Center until news came that President Morales was speaking to the UN General Assembly at that very moment, and would arrive at our meeting as soon as he was finished.  The techies in the room did their best to transmit the live broadcast of Evo’s speech through the LCD projector but managed to finally get it working just in time to hear the applause as Morales exited the stage.

President Morales and his entourage finally arrived, greeting and shaking hands with new friends and old, along the walk to the front of the room.  Pablo Salón opened the meeting with an update on the status of the negotiations going on at the UN General Assembly across the street.  He was not optimistic in where they were headed, and instead emphasized the importance of the upcoming UN Climate meetings in Cancún for advancing the “Cochabamba Accord” and the “Rights of Mother Earth.”  Both of these emerged in April of this year as outcomes from the World Peoples’ Summit on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth that took place in Cochabamba, Bolivia.  Morales organized the summit to bring together climate justice and Indigenous leaders from around the world to discuss a peoples’ alternative to Obama’s heavy handed and highly undemocratic “Copenhagen Accord” that had been “acknowledged” but not adopted at the Copenhagen Climate Summit last December.  Obama, Salón pointed out, had just that morning at the UN General Assembly pushed his Copenhagen Accord.

Ambassador Salón emphasized that, although language from the Cochabamba agreement had so far been included in the text of the negotiations at the interim climate meetings, it was going to take a major social mobilization before and during Cancún to ensure that the Cochabamba language makes its way into the final text.  This call to mobilize had been raised at the recent Social Forum of the Americas in Paraguay and was being taken up by social movements around Latin America.

Next on the agenda, Representatives from Mexican social movements discussed the plans already being organized for Cancún.  The crux of this long and detailed series of presentations was that, although there have been some differences between the Mexican social movements and organizations in terms of tactics and objectives, (differences which were being exploited by the government and the media), they were trying to put aside those differences to create one unified alternative space in Cancún–a space where social movements of all types could come together and share strategies and information with the aim to advance the struggle for climate justice.

Caravans of social movements to Cancún are being planned from points throughout the Americas.  On the 20th of November, a huge march will take place in Mexico City on the 100th Anniversary of the Mexican revolution.  And on the 7th of December, Via Campesina has called for “Thousands of Cancuns” to take place all over the world.

When President Morales finally spoke, he too emphasized the need to show a united front.  He insisted, “It’s up to us.  If we want the Cochabamba Accord, it will be up to the power of the people.”  He continued, explaining, “I don’t believe very much in governments, but we need an alliance of social movements and progressive governments to find solutions, otherwise the planet is going to cook.  We need a party in Cancun.  We must cool the earth down and heal the earth of her fever.”

When the topic moved on to discussing the advancement of REDD–the UN’s hotly contested scheme to supposedly reduce deforestation by including forests in the carbon market–Pablo Salón explained that REDD will be a major focus of the negotiations in Cancún.  He emphasized that the pro-REDD forces there are stacking the deck, hand picking who will be allowed to participate.  Meanwhile the Mexican government is doing its best to legitimize REDD.  “They are trying to manipulate the process to make it seem like Indigenous Peoples support REDD. REDD will be a crucial battle.  It must be clear that there is no agreement among Indigenous Peoples about REDD.”  He concluded by saying, “Using Indigenous Peoples to legitimize the buying and selling of nature is a big problem and we will do what we can to stop it.”

The consensus of the meeting was that the movements supporting the Cochabamba Accord and the Rights of Mother Earth need a unified message–one that is strongly opposed to carbon markets and against REDD.  But it was also agreed that it is not so much the Cochabamba Accord itself that must be supported, but its ideas and positions.

The final take away message of the meeting was that social movements must continue to organize and coordinate in preparation for Cancún, and that this must include a concerted effort to raise the issues in the media.  As Pablo Salón explained, “We need as much media coverage as possible.”

Those of us who attended are now tasked with taking these mandates to our allies and our constituencies in the countdown toward Cancún.  Global Justice Ecology Project is taking this up and will be focused on connecting mainstream and alternative media with the voices of people resisting the impacts of climate change and fossil fuels, and with the messages of social movements fighting for climate justice.  We will be doing our part to advance the principles of the Cochabamba Accord and the Rights of Mother Earth.

See you in the streets!

Photo: Evo Morales speaks at the Church Center of the United Nations while Cassandra Smithies translates.  Photo: Petermann/GJEP

Comments Off on An Evening with Evo

Filed under Climate Justice, Indigenous Peoples, Posts from Anne Petermann, REDD

Listen to the latest Global Justice Ecology Project Podcast with Raj Patel

Click here to listen to the Podcast with acclaimed activist and author Raj Patel

For more information about Raj go to rajpatel.org

Comments Off on Listen to the latest Global Justice Ecology Project Podcast with Raj Patel

Filed under Independent Media

Listen to acclaimed activist and author Raj Patel tomorrow morning on KPFK Los Angeles 7am PST

Click here to listen to Raj Patel tomorrow (Thursday) morning at 7am PST

For more information about Raj go to rajpatel.org

Comments Off on Listen to acclaimed activist and author Raj Patel tomorrow morning on KPFK Los Angeles 7am PST

Filed under Independent Media