Two Percent Price-Tag for a Green Economy

Note: The Green Economy is a rising star among the corporate and government actors who wish to maintain business as usual for as long as possible.  Leahy’s article below gives some details about where it is headed.  For GJEP’s analysis of the Green Economy, please check out our article in Z Magazine “Biodiversity Conference Hijacked” that was written during the UN Convention on Biological Diversity, and takes a critical look at the Green Economy.
–The GJEP Team

Cross-posted from IPS News

By Stephen Leahy

UXBRIDGE, Canada, Feb 23, 2011 (IPS) – Growth-obsessed markets and governments are pillaging the planet and it must stop, a new U.N. report warns.

The present “brown” economic system driven by fossil fuel energy and the
serial depletion and degradation of natural resources and ecosystems has
no future and must be replaced by a green economy, says the Green
Economy report launched in Nairobi, Kenya this week by the United
Nations Environment Programme (UNEP).

Investing just two percent of the global economy into a few key sectors
will kick-start a transition towards a low- carbon, resource-efficient
economy, the report says. With that relatively small investment, many of
the world’s biggest challenges – climate change, poverty, hunger, jobs,
sanitation, energy, food – could be successfully met within two generations..

“The Green Economy provides a vital part of the answer of how to keep
humanity’s ecological footprint within planetary boundaries,” said Achim
Steiner, UNEP executive director.

“It aims to link the environmental imperatives for changing course to
economic and social outcomes,” Steiner said.

The report documents that a green, low-carbon, resource- efficient
economy will be at least as prosperous as the old brown economy. Better
still, a green economy will not have the inherent risks, shocks,
scarcities and crises of the resource-depleting, high carbon ‘brown’
economy, it says.

“A green economy is not about stifling growth and prosperity, it is
about reconnecting with what is real wealth; re-investing in rather than
just mining natural capital; and favouring the many over the few,” says
Pavan Sukhdev, an economist on secondment from Deutsche Bank and head of
UNEP’s Green Economy Initiative.

The first step on the road to a green economy is to phase out the over
600 billion dollars in global fossil fuel subsidies and “re-direct the
more than 20-billion-dollar subsidies [that] perversely reward those
involved in unsustainable fisheries”, said Sukhdev.

“Misallocation of capital is at the centre of the world’s current
dilemmas and there are fast actions that can be taken starting literally
today,” he said in a statement.

The fact that the world spends between one and two percent of global GDP
subsidising unsustainable resource use puts a lie to the oft-cited claim
that environmental investments come at a cost to economic growth.
Industrial agriculture is another example of a heavily subsidised sector
that contributes up to one-third of all greenhouse gas emissions and has
other massive environmental side effects.

Moreover, industrial agriculture has failed to properly feed up to a
billion people a year for decades, says the International Federation of
Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM).

That clear failure and the environmental destruction it has caused is a
clarion call for a shift to agro-ecological practices as recommended by
the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and
Technology for Development (IAASTD). Those practices have been endorsed
by UNEP, the FAO, World Bank and over 50 countries, according to an
IFOAM statement made on behalf of farmer organisations.

Putting agro-eco practices into place will require governments to shift
their subsidies and policies to support small food producers and their
efforts to nurture the majority of the world’s ecosystems and biodiversity.

The “Towards a Green Economy” report acknowledges some jobs in the brown
economy will be lost. However, new jobs will be created, green jobs that
are both better for people and the environment. The report defines the
green economy as “one that results in improved human well-being and
social equity, while significantly reducing environmental risks and
ecological scarcities”.

“I am pleased to read that UNEP shares with workers around the world the
deep belief that a green economy should work for the people and the
planet, and not just for GDP growth and a few wealthy companies,” said
Sharan Burrow of the International Trade Union Confederation, a labour
organisation representing 176 million workers in 151 countries and

“The policies being pursued by governments at the moment risk taking us
backwards. Neo-liberal recipes, based on the dictates of the financial
markets, have to be jettisoned,” Burrow said in a statement.

To create a truly green economy requires governments to take back their
responsibilities to regulate banking and finance, and promote policies
which stimulate greening of workplaces and creation of new green jobs,
she said.

Green is the best way for Europe to re-energise its faltering economy,
according to a major new report released in Brussels this week by the
German Environment Ministry. A massive burst of investment in green
technologies aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent by
2020 will not only be good for the global climate it will bring wide
economic benefits to the 27 countries of the European Union.

“European governments must not ignore evidence that moving to a 30
percent target is in Europe’s own economic interests, when the lives of
millions of poor people, already hit by climate change, are on the
line,” said Tim Gore, Oxfam’s climate change policy spokesman.

Enormous inertia and resistance will have to be overcome to make the
shift from brown to green. Governments will have to become “green
activists” to make it happen, experts acknowledge.

It is up to each country to act, says UNEP spokesperson Nick Nuttall.
Taxation and smart market mechanisms that shift consumer spending and
promote green innovation will be needed. Policies that favour renewable
energy and government spending that stimulates green economic sectors
and limits spending that deplete natural capital will be among the
changes needed.

Relying on markets and investors to power the shift to green economy is
unlikely to work, says Christine von Weizsäcker, representing civil
society at the UNEP meetings in Nairobi where the report was released.
Governments will have to be active in directing the shift by enforcing
rules and practices like the precautionary principle protecting human
rights, said Weizsäcker, a biologist with ECOROPA, a German NGO.

“Stopping perverse subsidies certainly should be one of the core issues
of the green economy,” she said.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Climate Change

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>